Search for: "HODGES v. STATE"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2015, 1:11 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
It is arguable that Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs’ “subjective intention” test is more in line with the approach taken by the German courts in Östrogenblocker (applied by Hacon HHJ in the case at hand), which introduced a mental element based on foreseeability. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:43 am
Hodges went through Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:30 pm
Texas, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
In North Carolina v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
While Windsor held that Congress’ power to define marriage was limited, the federal circuits are currently split regarding whether principles of individual rights or of federalism ground the Windsor opinion, and this very question is currently pending before the Supreme Court in Obergefell v Hodges (Dkt No 14-556). [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:29 am
Hodges, which ruled that bans on same-sex marriage are unconstitutional, and Loving v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Harris, Hodges v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Dennis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm
Texas (2003), United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 7:24 pm
Hodges as cases the Court ought to “reconsider. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:38 am
It was not until the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Hodges,[11] in which the Court recognized a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Judge Aiken stated that the plaintiffs had identified a fundamental right: the right to a “climate system capable of sustaining human life. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Hodges,[11] in which the Court recognized a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Judge Aiken stated that the plaintiffs had identified a fundamental right: the right to a “climate system capable of sustaining human life. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Hodges,[11] in which the Court recognized a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Judge Aiken stated that the plaintiffs had identified a fundamental right: the right to a “climate system capable of sustaining human life. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
State Water Contractors v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:22 am
Hodges have to say? [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
The appeal will be heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
A second opinion concluded that Y was in a vegetative state and that there was no prospect of improvement. [read post]
