Search for: "HOLDING v. STATE"
Results 641 - 660
of 69,976
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
But, the beloved international community can hold up a ruling against Israel as a reason to deny aid and funding. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:50 am
A liquated damages provision is not automatically considered unenforceable but rather it would be based on what was stated in the provision, such as if damages flowing from a breach in contract were easily ascertainable at the time of the execution or if the damages are conspicuously disproportionate to the probable losses (see JMD Holding Corp. v Cong. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
Proponents of this viewpoint also pointed to the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 1:05 am
Events The Information Commissioner’s Office is holding the Data Protection Practitioners Conference on Tuesday 8 October 2024, online. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm
The answer – according to settled case law – is that the term ‘Member States’ refers to ‘government authorities of the Member States’ (see, for example, Région wallonne v Commission (para. 6.)). [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
In CFPB v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
The seller in the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision in Trifecta Multimedia Holdings Inc. and Dave Young v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm
See Corwin v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
IA-6368 (Aug. 23, 2023) (the Adopting Release) available at https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/final/2023/ia-6383.pdf.[2] National Association of Private Fund Managers v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
” In this matter, the Court aligned itself with the reasoning articulated in the recent federal New York City v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:00 am
This entry was authored by MGKF Summer Associate Karina ZakarianOn June 25, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in a case of first impression, vacated the United States District Court for the District of Maryland’s holding in 68th Street Site Work Group v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
In 1986, in Bowers v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 8:23 am
The issue is controlled by a 2017 Appeals Court decision, Berger v. 2 Wyndcliff, LLC, 92 Mass.App.Ct. 517 (2017) which holds that restrictive covenants cannot be extended unless the original covenants contain a clear mechanism for such extension. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 8:15 am
V, no. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court case Mississippi Univ. for Women v. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In Chestnut v. [read post]
