Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL v. US "
Results 641 - 660
of 1,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Global Broadcast News Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Foraying into non-traditional identity: non-traditional trade mark registrations (International Law Office) India's first 'doctrine of equivalents' case: Ravi Kamal Bali v Kala Tech (Spicy IP) Response to the Mint article on alleged corruption in the Indian Patent Offices (Patent Circle) Transparency in the court: recording oral proceedings - the way forward? [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:15 am
Or a record company might want nothing to do with a particular product. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:46 am
Law on International Commercial Arbitration and served as the Chair of the Arbitration Task Force of the Searle Civil Justice Institute. – In a press release dated the same day as the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
American Home Products, Inc., slip op. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:05 am
The bill received royal assent on December 13, 2018.Moreover, the copyright provisions in the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement significantly alter the copyright balance by extending the term of copyright by additional 20 years beyond our current law and the international standard found in the Berne Convention. [read post]
23 May 2012, 9:47 am
He serves his clients through the litigation or consulting lifecycle by assisting them with important issues like data scoping, preserving, gathering, processing, hosting, review and production, as well as deeper diving issues uncovered through the use of computer forensics. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
What about a US-style Federal Appeals Court to review all freedom of speech of decisions? [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Maybe hopefully, successors in the major publishers’ endeavours, such as Karnov and perhaps v-Lex Group, winner of the 2023 “Overall Legal Analytics Solution Of The Year”, by LegalTech Breakthrough, would appear to be more measured and thoughtful in their acquisitions and their content licensing deals in and beyond their home markets; crossing national borders, the use of the English language can be a unifying factor. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:46 am
In California v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal… [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm
These reports come as the U.S. government continues to warn against the use of Chinese tech platforms and products. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
The case is Home Paramount Pest Control Cos. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm
The Home Affairs Select Committee heard evidence on anti-Muslim sentiments in the print media, a session which the print media wholly failed to report. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:40 am
Firstly, international law was vital in apprehending 9/11 and 'converting' it into an event to which the US could respond to. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
(denying specific performance where home contractor used wrong brand of plumbing pipes)? [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 1:52 pm
Move Press, LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
See IIT Research Institute v. [read post]
