Search for: "Hales v. Hales" Results 641 - 660 of 1,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm by Dave
In fact, the future was barely considered at all, so that Birmingham's case really fell at the first hurdle - after all, that is precisely what Baroness Hale was requiring local authorities to do in Moran (and, it might be added, significantly lowering the threshold for a finding of homelessness). [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
In relation to the provision of accommodation under the National Assistance Act 1948, my noble and learned friend, Baroness Hale of Richmond, then Hale LJ, said in R (Wahid) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2002] EWCA Civ 287 [2003] HLR 13, para 33, "[n]eed is a relative concept, which trained and experienced social workers are much better equipped to assess than are lawyers and courts, provided that they act rationally". [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm by INFORRM
“We need much more serious journalism in this country and our defamation law should encourage rather than discourage it,” said Baroness Hale in Jameel. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Dissenting, Lady Hale agreed with the principles discussed by Lord Wilson, but held that the Government failed to strike a fair balance between the very limited public benefits of the cap and the severe damage done to the family lives of young children and their lone parents. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am by Darryl Hutcheson, Matrix
By contrast, Lady Hale felt that while it was proper to take into account public services which there was a statutory duty to supply ([94]), family support was different. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:11 am by Iona Millership
  The application for permission to appeal and submissions relevant to appeal were heard by the Supreme Court (Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson) on 21 April 2016. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by Isabel McArdle
However, the second of his examples makes it clear that very adverse consequences for an applicant (or per Baroness Hale, the “extremity of consequences for the individual”) are capable, in combination with a strong argument that there has been an error of law, of amounting to “some other compelling reason.” The examples of Lord Dyson, in the case of Cart v the Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28 were, … (i) a case where it is strongly arguable that the… [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm by Giles Peaker
In her dissenting judgement in R (N) v Lewisham, Baroness Hale expressed puzzlement that that appeared to be the generally accepted view. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 5:29 am
Although its caption suggests a prize fight, when the Supreme Court hears oral arguments tomorrow in No. 06-116, Moylan v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Sales LJ was unconvinced that the criteria set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 – intended to reflect the balance of justice in relation to applications to admit fresh evidence – had not been satisfied and KV was unable to demonstrate that evidence such as Dr Cohen’s report could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use earlier. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am by ASAD KHAN
 But Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin did not agree with Sales and Patten LJJ. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:29 am by Charlie Tomlinson, Olswang LLP
Appeal to the Supreme Court The appeal was heard by the Supreme Court on 10 November 2014 by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge. [read post]