Search for: "Hamilton v. United States" Results 641 - 660 of 1,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
References: More on the Textron Decision, In-House Lawyers' Latest Worry from the WSJ Law Blog Audit Work Papers Were Discoverable by IRS Since They Were Done for SEC-Required Financial Statements Not Litigation from Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation Ruling in Tax-Auditing Case Puts Corporations on Edge by Amir Efrati for The Wall Street Journal Textron decision on work product privilege by Alice Woodley on the Legal Ethics Forum Textron decision – Hosted on… [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am by William Ford
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by John Elwood
United States 15-5991Issue: Whether, in the bank-fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
United States (1926) claimed that the Supreme Court should not treat as an important precedent the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 because everyone knew Reconstruction was a time in which Republicans were engaged in pure politics. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 12:39 am
Webster also noted that Timothy Pickering, then secretary of state, “sent to me for the original paper, and had the letter in the original with a translation, if I mistake not, published in the Gazette of the United States”. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
S. 707; or the free exercise of religion, Hamilton v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Chris
While at WilmerHale he was the lead counsel representing the University of Michigan and its then president Lee Bollinger before the United States Supreme Court in the famous Gratz v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm by Thomas Hopson
Lohier served as a judge on the prominent antitrust case United States v. [read post]