Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 5:31 am
Previously, in the much criticized case C-539/03 – Roche Nederland v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 2:01 am
Harmon, Jr., and Jeanne Harmon We'll post the BIO when it is available. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:58 pm
Justice Alito with opinion in Husted v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:51 am
Rule 8-131(c)) and case law (Friendly Finance v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:41 pm
In Youngblood v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:57 am
I get that if the Harmonized System Committee changes the law, Customs will implement the change. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:47 pm
There’s a caricature of US v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 11:28 pm
In this way, the court made clear that the reliance criterion is not a requirement which is relevant under harmonized trade mark law. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "[i]t is fundamental that a court, in interpreting a statute, should attempt to effectuate the intent of the Legislature," citing Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y. v City of New York, 41 NY2d 205.The Appellate Division opined that the plain language of the amendment and its legislative history establish that the amendment was intended, as relevant to Plaintiff, to permit certain… [read post]
25 May 2021, 3:32 pm
General Note 3 to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule does not often come up. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 7:11 am
Regarding proposed Reg BI, SIFMA recommended that the definition of “retail customer” be harmonized with FINRA’s definition because the definition as proposed would result in inconsistent and redundant compliance structures.SIFMA also urged the SEC to incorporate the “reasonable investor” definition of materiality set forth in Basic v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 11:57 am
The National Intellectual Property Office, Hungary("the Office") communicated to Incyte the grant of the SPC on 7 October 2014, with a notice that an appeal to the administrative decision could be filed to the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest High Court, Hungary) within 30 days of the communication of the decision. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
As a general rule, a party does not have a right to appeal a court's interlocutory order or an interlocutory decision. *** See Matter of Carver v State of New York, 26 NY3d 272The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03870.htm [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:34 pm
For the most part, the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States has an internal logic and consistent format that eases navigation. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:14 am
If that argument swayed the Supreme Court, the court’s ultimate decision on the merits may owe much to its 2018 decision in Trump v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:18 am
" This is how the majority harmonizes both statutes. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:21 am
The policy shift harmonizes the U.S. patent system with the rest of the world, but creates potential problems for small firms or inventors who do not have the resources to win a race to the patent office against large corporate competitors. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 5:20 am
It is worth recalling that this is not a court on the merits: its task is to ensure the correct interpretation and application of legislative provisions by lower courts.Of all the grounds of appeal to the Supreme Court, the most intriguing one is that concerning the application of relevant provisions in the Italian Copyright Act concerning moral rights.Moral rights under Italian law and the issue before the Supreme CourtMoral rights are not harmonized at the EU level. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:47 am
The Container Store v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:26 am
After the Svensson decision the questions posed to the Court were reduced to all but one, leaving more significance to that final question and its potential impact on the issue.The case in question was C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg, which dealt with the broadcasting of ice hockey games, which were supplied by C More for a nominal fee for those wishing to view the games live online as opposed to on TV. [read post]
