Search for: "Heaven v. Heaven"
Results 641 - 660
of 728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:34 pm
v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 8:17 am
He appeared in, among other things, the landmark Supreme Court case of National Textile Workers v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:59 pm
Now I find that commenter's view of the Geneva Convention unsustainable but one has to ask themselves why in heaven's name did the Bush Administration depart from standing DOD guidelines? [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 8:23 pm
" Heaven knows Gerry Spence can speak for himself, but whether he said that or not, I bet his actual thought process in voir dire is more subtle. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Reynolds v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 5:47 pm
Surely we are qualifying as inmates of von Jhering's heaven of legal concepts when we approach a legal problem in these essentially supernatural terms. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:46 pm
And best of all, in what can only have been a transparent attempt by the author to garner a review on this blog, one of his top ten decisions (non-dummy division) is an ERISA case, the Supreme Court’s decision in MetLife v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:46 pm
And best of all, in what can only have been a transparent attempt by the author to garner a review on this blog, one of his top ten decisions (non-dummy division) is an ERISA case, the Supreme Court’s decision in MetLife v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
By doing this centering, I felt more relaxed and in control of my situation, knowing that any negative situation and negative energy can be harmonized and neutralized, and that this can best be done by applying the five t'ai chi principles simultaneously at all times, those principles being relaxing and sinking into the ground and into one's seat when sitting, keeping the body upright as if the head is suspended from the heavens, keeping the weight balanced and separated as in yin… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
That changed in Payne v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:49 pm
Not that there is any rivalry intended, heaven forfend, we just like having new case info and things to speculate about up on the blog). [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:09 pm
Jurors in the Golden Hour Data Systems v. emsCharts case being tried in Marshall federal court this week will get a surprise tonight when they leave the courthouse and see the image to the left. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:10 am
(Techdirt) Harvard’s Charlie Nesson raises Constitutional questions in RIAA litigation (ZDNet Government) Head’s up RIAA: engage these kids passions: don’t sue your market for heaven’s sake (IP ADR Blog) Electronic Arts sued repeatedly of DRM (Techdirt) (Ars Technica) United Features realises that setting comics free online makes sense (Techdirt) Do the new SEC rules on linking violate section 230 safe harbours? [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:44 am
California and, with Justice Souter joining, Zamudio v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:45 pm
That there is no merit in the allegations and that there will never be an arbitration is of no deterrence (see, e.g., the countless times that the so-called "Sunbelt v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:43 pm
Some folks still don't like Marbury; that didn't make it a putsch, for heaven's sake. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:11 am
The petition in Kelly v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:01 am
These are the questions that have sparked a short and thought-provoking decision from SDNY Judge Marrero in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 9:48 am
The face-pieces of divers goggles comprise a seat for the diver's nose, which, in the case of goggles of the double-lens type, is situated between two rigid frames for fixing the lenses of the goggles, while in the case of single-lens goggles, it is situated between the central uprights-shaped substantially in the form of an inverted V-of the single frame which supports the lens. [read post]
