Search for: "Hoffman v. Hoffman" Results 641 - 660 of 1,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 8:37 am
In Aveling Barford v Perion Ltd, [1989] 5 BCC 677, Hoffman J. had held that “it is the fact that it was known and intended to be a sale at an undervalue which made it an unlawful distribution. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by David J. DePaolo
Supreme Court ruling from 10 years ago called Hoffman Plastic Compounds Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am by Stephen Page
To paraphrase Lord Atkin in United Australia v Barclays Bank[7], today, when the ghost of Mallet stands in the path of a just and equitable outcome, clanking its gender biased chains, the proper course for a judge is to pass through it undeterred. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:20 am
(The irony of course is that this following a state's "reasonable" decision).Hoffman v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:09 pm
In 2002 the United States Supreme Court decided Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v NLRB. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
’s Introduction: “Alabama Legal History as a Field of Study”Warren Hoffman: “Developments of the Enclosure Movement in Alabama: Disrupting the Free Roaming”Paul Rand: “Flush Times in the Chancery: A Brief Note on the History of Equity and Trusts”Helen Eckinger: “The Militarization of the University of Alabama”Eddie Lowe: “Economic Growth in Blount County: Attorneys, Companies, and Cases”Mike Dodson: “Pioneers in Alabama… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:08 am
" In the course of the disciplinary hearing the Board moved to enter into the hearing record evidence of a prior, 1999, § 3020-a hearing and decision wherein Hoffman was accused and acquitted of charges substantially similar to those under consideration in this disciplinary hearing. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
Readers interested in patent law will be familiar with last summer's decision of the UK Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:09 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 1002, the Best Evidence Rule, provides that An original writing, recording, or photograph is required in order to prove its content unless these rules or a federal statute provides otherwise. [read post]