Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 69,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:15 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm
This morning the Court issued a per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
The First District did not extend the Supreme Court’s holdings in State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 10:37 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:58 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied the State's petition for rehearing en banc in Polk v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:23 pm
” Carefirst of Md., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
The Supreme Court decided Coleman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:14 pm
The Supreme Court issued a new decision this week in the case of State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:59 am
In the case of Ball State University v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:40 pm
Holding: the court denied appellant’s motion properly. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
The majority opinion by Justice Kagan (for seven justices) emphasized stare decisis in holding that the case was not meaningfully different from Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:05 am
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 870, 875-876 (1989) and Peretz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:24 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:22 am
Recently, South Carolina joined the ranks of states standing up to insurers on this issue, with the state supreme court ruling in Williams v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:59 pm
"While we reaffirm our decision in Barajas v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
The post Rights Without Remedies | Davis v. [read post]
