Search for: "IN RE: ROSEN "
Results 641 - 660
of 808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2009, 3:28 am
Source: LexisNexis, Search run on September 18, 2009. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
It's almost 5:00 p.m. and I'm preparing to live-blog Cutting-Edge Topics In Class Action Litigation, which is taking place in Oakland at the offices of Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
This week, we’re trying out a new daily feature on SCOTUSBlog that summarizes coverage of and commentary about the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
(If you're interested in more, AmLawDaily dug a bit deeper into the ethics issues raised by the litigation.) [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 1:29 pm
Or folks can write directly to the Chair of the Appointments Committee, Robert Rosen. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:49 pm
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz 17. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:48 pm
NPR Listeners Pick 100 Best Beach Books (For NPR Listeners) I know what you're thinking: "NPR listeners go to the beach?! [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 1:33 am
The other Founding Directors are Larry Monin, Jonathan Rosen, David Thirkill and Elizabeth Thompson. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:47 am
They're out there every day showing off their expertise for free. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
Rosen v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 5:46 pm
@LeeRosen: A gifted blogger, family law attorney Lee Rosen is the best source of news and practice tips in this specialty area. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
Keep that in mind when you read any account on these issues by Rosen and the "Respectable Intellectual Center. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:28 am
(quoting In re Rosen, 673 F.2d at 391). [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
That means doing the best job we can in our given roles, not refraining from acting because we're afraid how our words will be taken. [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:13 am
The facts have proven how inept Jeffrey Rosen is at judging judicial nominees. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:10 am
More on Rosen here. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
If we want to discuss liberalism versus conservatism, let's do that; but let's do away with the pretense that we're really talking about the particular nominee, or that some sound bite should make the difference between confirmation and rejection.Conversely, and with all due respect to my guest co-blogger Rob, a former Sotomayor clerk, let us please dispense with the argument that Sotomayor should be confirmed because she is the best nominee in the best of… [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:59 pm
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz7. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:08 pm
Right now -- with the caveat, of course, that the situation is extremely fluid -- we're thinking Wood. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:02 pm
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz7. [read post]
