Search for: "IN RE JOHN B."
Results 641 - 660
of 3,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 4:01 am
"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:15 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:30 am
Several folks also wrote that they’re still using HP Laserjet 4L printers from 20 years ago. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:49 am
In re Cheezwhse.com, Inc., Serial No. 78694122 (February 1, 2008) [precedential].TTABlogger in Normandy (2005)Well, I doubt you would have guessed the first one: Applicant failed to comply with the PTO's requirement under Rule 2.61(b) for further information as to the geographic origin of the mark. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:02 am
John B. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:45 pm
Bloom, Thomas Walsh and Philip B. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:30 am
John Deere Ins. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:12 pm
O’Neil, Clerk of the Circuit Court, Pasco County John E. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:58 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:18 am
In re Dr. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 8:44 am
The law firm has brought E. coli lawsuits against such companies as Jack in the Box, Dole, ConAgra, Cargill, and Jimmy John’s. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 3:51 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 3:38 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 2:57 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 7:28 am
(They're generating quite a bit of new, general-revenue money in this bill.) [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am
.; Hamilton, John; Horan, John; Lord Jr., John S. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:18 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:23 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:46 am
E.g., In re Mayweather, 2020 U.S.P.Q.2d 11298, at *1 (PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE); In re Greenwood, 2020 U.S.P.Q.2d 11439, at *2 (GOD BLESS THE USA); In re Team Jesus, 2020 U.S.P.Q.2d 11489, at *5-6 (TEAM JESUS); see generally TMEP § 1202.04(b).Applicant maintained that there was no evidence that the term 40-0 is in widespread use, but the Board disagreed. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
Fraud claim: The Board observed that under In re Bose, a party claiming fraud must allege that the other party obtained the subject registration by "knowingly making a false, material representation of fact with intent to deceive" the USPTO. [read post]
