Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: K. F." Results 641 - 660 of 2,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2018, 9:59 am by Jan von Hein
This requires a free-standing application by an interested party to the relevant state authority which is responsible for determining the application. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Epstein (Chicago), Neal K. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Interesting set of motions in an E.D. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:29 am by Edward Welch and Nazia Khan
Specifically, the amendments require a cooling-off period for officers and directors for the later of (1) 90 days following the adoption of a Rule 10b5-1 plan; or (2) two business days following the disclosure of the issuer’s financial reports in an Annual Report on Form 10-K or a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter in which the Rule 10b5-1 plan was adopted or, for a foreign private issuer, in a Form 20-F or a Form 6-K that discloses the… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:05 am by Edward Welch and Nazia Khan
Specifically, the amendments require a cooling-off period for officers and directors for the later of (1) 90 days following the adoption of a Rule 10b5-1 plan; or (2) two business days following the disclosure of the issuer’s financial reports in an Annual Report on Form 10-K or a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter in which the Rule 10b5-1 plan was adopted or, for a foreign private issuer, in a Form 20-F or a Form 6-K that discloses the… [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:18 pm
Immun. shields FL DOR & VA DSS from claims for stay violations in trying to collect prepet. interest on DSO. t.co/Dr4uiyq D-TX: ERISA plan insurer states valid claim for constructive trust on collected premium not turned over & swept by BOA. t.co/h93XpFO D-KY cuts atty fees award to K&E for contract breach by 2/3; case not difficult and Ashland, KY local rates sufficient. t.co/2H8ej5R B-SDNY applies 2d Cir Enron op. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:22 am by Theo Francis
The B shares, of course, are firmly in the hands of the Dolan family; its patriarch, Charles F. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
 It observed that Petitioner, as the party asserting equitable estoppel here, must first make prima facie showing that [Reymond F.] and the child had a parent-child relationship, so as to shift the burden to [Reymond F.] to prove that it was nonetheless in the child’s best interests to order genetic marker testing. [read post]