Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. R. C. J."
Results 641 - 660
of 2,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2019, 6:31 am
Posted by , on Friday, October 25, 2019 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of October 18–24, 2019. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am
(j) Optometric corporation. (1) Licensed physicians and surgeons. (2) Licensed doctors of podiatric medicine. (3) Licensed psychologists. (4) Registered nurses. (5) Licensed chiropractors. (6) Licensed acupuncturists. (7) Naturopathic doctors. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
Any Other Interesting Information or Background? [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Put another way, the current tax regime’s complex withholding, reporting, and expense-related rules may dissuade potential gig economy workers who may not have the knowledge or experience needed to comply with their tax obligations. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:31 am
The TCJA’s reduction in the HMID’s cap increased the effective marginal tax rate on owner-occupied housing, particularly for debt-financed housing. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was R. c. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am
Prince Edward Island (PEISC (AD)) (aff’d by the Supreme Court of Canada) and the BC Court of Appeal decision in R. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
Marable, III, Kendall C. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
R. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:29 pm
455, per McLachlin J. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful – Suneet Sharma. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
R. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Il existe également plusieurs moyens de règlement de différends, déjà adoptés par l’État, qui sont moins attentatoires. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:03 pm
’s interest in the Trust represents an error of law. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Roth, and Elina Tetelbaum, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Monday, September 23, 2019 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Conflicts of interest, Controlling shareholders, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Materiality, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, Shareholder value, Special committees The Effects of Shareholder Primacy, Publicness, and… [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Id. at 1330–31 (Moore, J.); see also id. at 1316–22 (O’Malley, J.) [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:09 pm
Justices Côté and Brown took a different approach in construing s. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 4:22 pm
David J. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
In view of the tightening of what will be allowed and not with the revised RPBA that enters into force on 01.01.2020, it wil be interested whether a future Board will come to the same conclusion.In any case, it appears that there should be a referral as this decision follows T 1914/12 which however distinguished from T 1621/09, and seems is a fundamental point of law.Legal backgroundArticle 113 - Right to be heard and basis of decisionsThe decisions of the European Patent Office… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Circuit has specifically applied this to denials of a 501(c)(3) tax exemption, holding that "in administering the tax code, the IRS may not discriminate on the basis of viewpoint" (there, against pro-Israel speech that departed from the Administration's foreign policy).[4] 2. [read post]
