Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF R. P., A CHILD"
Results 641 - 660
of 839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
A Federal Magistrates Court decision requiring a barrister to pay over $5000 costs to the other party, and reporting the barrister to his disciplinary body has been overturned, pending a further trial before a different Federal Magistrate.The case, known as R (a barrister) and Roberts, was decided by the Full Court of the Family Court.16 December, 2008On that day, the date of the original trial, one of the issues in the original case was whether or not the husband was the father of the… [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
R. 416(c) was untimely because the rule was directory and defendant’s rights were protected as he was provided with additional attorneys who specialized in death penalty cases. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:45 pm
In a case concerning whether Solomon P. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:20 pm
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 3:20 am
The line "moral disapproval, without any other asserted state interest,' has never been a rational basis for legislation" is from O'Connor's concurring opinion in Lawrence — and Walker's opinion is clear about that (on p. 133). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:41 am
R. 4:86-4(b); R. 4:86-4(d). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 2:08 am
(For more, see P. van Parijs, ‘The Disfranchisement of the Elderly, and Other Attempts to Secure Intergenerational Justice (1999) 27 Philosophy and Public Affairs 292-333). [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
(Id. at p. 373.) [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm
One Law For All make five recommendations at the end of their report (p. 24). [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
R. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:47 pm
Op. at p. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:13 am
., BER-P-036-10, Koblitz, P.J.Ch., July 2, 2010: The appointment of a special medical guardian is governed by R. 4:86-12 which, in addition to stating the standard to be applied by the Court, sets forth that the procedure on such an application “shall conform as nearly as practicable to the requirements of R. 4:86-1 to R. 4:86-6 . . . [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:53 am
The P judgment represents an example of how interagency cooperation should not be done. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
*498 HAROLD R. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
All this leads us to the view that the 2002 Act envisages the court exercising its powers to make contact orders post adoption, where such orders are in the interests of the child concerned. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm
" Slip Op at p. 11. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:02 pm
” (p. 35). [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Vol. 2, No. 15, June 5, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Vol. 2, No. 15, June 5, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
