Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 641 - 660
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
Hugh Tomlinson QC is the joint author of the Law of Human Rights, 2nd Edn, 2009, and an editor of Inforrm [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am
The 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square website has a piece about the recent privacy cases of Richard Spearman QC – the Tweedledum of the injunction circuit according to the “Independent” (with Inforrm committee member Hugh Tomlinson QC being the “Tweedledee”). [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm
It does, however, remove the current requirement for the opinion to be on a matter of public interest (for a comment on this see the recent Inforrm post by Gavin Phillipson). [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm
Facebook Ireland Limited and Another [2013] NIQB 14, (see the Inforrm post here) and of course the potential for a service provider like Google to be liable for defamation after receipt of a complaint: Tamiz v Google. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
Inforrm has covered many of the cases (and others mentioned at the conference) in the past year – use the search box on the right or the table of cases to find related commentaries. “Centre of interests” Jaron Lewis, a partner at RPC, where he leads the firm’s media group, updated delegates on online defamation & privacy and began with the Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez v MGN Ltd in relation to jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 3:12 am
. ● “Twitter cannot keep hiding behind blanket anonymity,” writes Stephen Kinsella founder of Clean up the Internet in an Inforrm’s Blog, which builds on a new report featuring opinion polling showing that the UK public overwhelmingly believe anonymity makes people ruder online; that social media companies aren’t doing enough to tackle anonymous abuse; and that a majority believe that social media bosses who fail to act to tackle abuse should… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
Lord Neuberger’s committee on super injunctions, as mentioned in this week’s Inforrm round up, is due to report by the end of April. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 2:29 am
Several blog posts analysed the decision and background in some detail with the excellent Transparency project providing the fullest coverage, in particular: Religious and cultural identity in foster care The most secretive court in all of Christendom – Transparency Project Reporting Watch (reposted on Inforrm) Misreporting the misreporting – that foster care case again A large number of complaints have been made to IPSO about the story but it seems… [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
As Inforrm has previously reported, Mullis and Scott propose that the overwhelming majority of English libel cases should be considered by the County Court, the Tribunals Service, or an appropriate media regulatory body. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 1:54 am
As previously reported on The Injunctions Blog and on Inforrm the High Court held that it had jurisdiction to grant website-blocking injunctions against ISPs in cases involving trade mark infringement. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:45 am
Former News International lawyer Andrew Chadwick and Hugh Tomlinson of Matrix Chambers and the Inforrm media law blog have been proposing Media Regulation Tribunals: This radical new proposal would roll in libel reform with reform of self-regulation to develop a pan-media tribunals system that would hear complaints relating to journalism, including PCC code issues, as well as defamation and privacy breaches, arguably relatively cheaply and quickly and with specialist expertise. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:07 am
Press Regulation Reports this week included: Inforrm reposted Amber Melville-Browns piece from Legal Cheek: Who wants to be a regulator? [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
Inforrm published commentary on the judgement here and here, 5RB’s response to the judgement can be found here. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
Inforrm has an article on the ban and the uncertain future of the oversight board. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm
In Week 7 of the Leveson Inquiry, Lord Justice Leveson continued to hear evidence from editors and executives of the press. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm
(See also the Daily Mail and Guardian reports that James Murdoch was personally involved in authorising deletion of emails about phone hacking here; and here), And an interesting You Gov opinion poll for Impress published at Inforrm website. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB - Read judgment The case of OPQ v BJM addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
