Search for: "In Interest of CT" Results 641 - 660 of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2021, 10:39 am by The Murray Law Firm
Jonathan Dasilva Fatally Injured in Shooting Outside Bridgeport, CT Bar. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
The basis for asserting the claim had to be a CT or PE. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
The basis for asserting the claim had to be a CT or PE. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 1:58 pm
  But if a defendant says "I want the jury to see your whole face; here's a transparent mask, wear that one," is there really a state interest in saying "Nope, the witness is free to obscure half of his face while testifying (and do so behind a plexiglass shield, even) despite the fact there's not really a state interest in making sure the mask isn't transparent? [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 3:09 pm
The father argued that the writ would interfere with the daughter’s interest in the account. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:10 pm
 Pretty basic corporate law.But the Court of Appeal then says, citing a prior opinion from the Court of Appeal:  "Section 2000, however, does not permit a lack-of-control discount when determining the fair value of a minority shareholder interest. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
 Not surprisingly, defendant wants to rebut this testimony.So defendant sends out a discovery demand that plaintiff submit to testing by its own vocational rehabilitation expert, who will take no more than two hours with plaintiff and conduct an "interview and administration of written examination, including interest testing and aptitude testing to examine plaintiff with respect to his employment history, prospects and interests. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:42 pm
Good to know, at least.The holding is in a context that's somewhat interesting, however. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 8:48 pm
  Sometime later, Trust acquired the debt obligation as part of a securitized pool and appointed Substitute to enforce the security interest. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 12:22 pm by K&L Gates
Harris sought to quash the subpoena, but his motion was denied by the court for lack of standing—the court found that he had no proprietary interest in the information sought and that his claimed privacy interest was “understandable” but “without merit. [read post]