Search for: "In Interest of Doe Children" Results 641 - 660 of 18,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2019, 3:09 am by INFORRM
Children Children are easily reachable in school, which is the best place to teach them media literacy. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:09 am by Aaron Weems
The Court felt that being separated did not justify a third party needing to step in for the children’s best interests or for the state to exercise parens patrie powers. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:34 pm
On Friday, the Commission formally began a rule making proceeding regarding children and electronic media. [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:05 am by Deborah Pearlstein
As it stands, the failure of current public debate to engage the complex reality serves neither the interests of national security nor freedom of expression. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:06 pm
If you or your child’s other parent are exhibiting symptoms of COVID-19, it may be in the children's best interests to forego parenting time with that parent until you have been tested for the virus and have been found negative. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by umbrella
  The Applicable Legal Principles Section 29 of the Children’s Law Reform Act states: A court shall not make an order under this Part that varies an order in respect of custody or access made by a court in Ontario unless there has been a material change in circumstances [emphasis added] that affects or is likely to affect the best interests of the child. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by umbrella
  The Applicable Legal Principles Section 29 of the Children’s Law Reform Act states: A court shall not make an order under this Part that varies an order in respect of custody or access made by a court in Ontario unless there has been a material change in circumstances [emphasis added] that affects or is likely to affect the best interests of the child. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm by Jim Gerl
  Pick almost any movie with bullies and the victim eventually gets ticked off and does in the bad guy. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
This balancing test requires that we determine whether the State action about which a party has complained (here, a prohibition on the use of corporal punishment in a foster home) “substantially burdens [the] free exercise of religion, and, if it does, whether the Commonwealth has shown that it has an interest sufficiently compelling to justify that burden. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am by MBettman
[T]he right of parents to raise their children, coupled with the concomitant right of children to be raised by their parents, may not be interfered with unless the parent is unfit. [read post]
Let it be known that Focus on the Family does not speak for you or your family. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
Moreover, I am interested in how you'd argue the question of harm: does look [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm by Jamie Markham
The reason a federal judge found the prior 300 foot rule to be unconstitutionally overbroad was that it was poorly tailored to further the state’s interest in protecting children: it applied to some offenders who never committed a crime against a child. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm by Jamie Markham
The reason a federal judge found the prior 300 foot rule to be unconstitutionally overbroad was that it was poorly tailored to further the state’s interest in protecting children: it applied to some offenders who never committed a crime against a child. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:36 am by Attorney David Centeno
The law assumes that the money will somehow make its way to the children, as there’s rent, food and utilities to spend it on for their best interest. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But denying legal status does not make the migrants disappear. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:29 am by Kerry Abrams
Kerry Abrams Why does our current family law system so frequently fail children, and how can we fix it? [read post]