Search for: "In Interest of Ec" Results 641 - 660 of 1,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2016, 7:52 am by Andy
At the end of last month the CJEU heard an interesting case which has been little reported to date. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The judge highlighted the fact that information published on the Facebook pages harmed the public interest by, among other things, creating a risk of reoffending, inciting violence and hatred and creating the potential for public order situations [98]. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:20 am
Namely, the High Court wondered whether Article 24 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters ("Brussels I Regulation") applied in case where one party was domiciled in a non-EU Member State (Brussels I has been replaced by "Brussels I Regulation (Recast)" in January 2015. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 17 March it will hear the appeal of In the matter of N (Children) (Adoption: Jurisdiction) concerning the applicability of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, art 15, to applications for care orders and the proper approach to the assessment of the children’s best interests on applications for transfer of care proceedings, in the present case from England to Hungary. [read post]
This was not required if the third party was “acting as an agent to perform task(s) on behalf of and under the instructions of the organization” [read: processor] (See Onward Transfer principle, Safe Harbor Decision 2000/520/EC, Annex I). [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
This decision will be welcome to all who are interested in protecting GI’s. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:52 am
This Kat reported on the publication of the draft Statutory Instrument that will implement the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court in UK law, with a promise of a detailed report later. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:20 am
Looking out for IP judgments sometimes requiresthe help of the AmeriKat's fuzzy friendsThere are often occasions where the AmeriKat spies an interesting decision that she would love to digest and share with readers, but then a shinier, more attractive IP decision takes her fancy. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:37 am by Martin George
According to the ECJ’s decision in Case C-521/11 Amazon.com, this system is consistent with the requirements of Art. 5(2) of the Copyright Directive (Directive 2001/29/EC). [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am by INFORRM
Tort gateway It is on the issue of the tort gateway that the judgment becomes interesting, as the Judge found that there was a good arguable case against Google in relation to libel, harassment, and unlawful data processing (although not Article 8 privacy) on account of the fact that Google had taken 23 days after notice of URL2 to remove it, which was arguably too long. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to readers of this blog. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
As the applicants were not considered intermediaries, they could not invoke the limited liability of hosting service providers, as provided in the Directive 2000/31/EC on Electronic Commerce. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:56 am by Laura Sekula
CCPs will have a strong interest in becoming fully compliant with EU equivalence conditions, which should help to shorten the period. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Nonetheless, it observed that there was a difference between a commercial reputational interest and the reputational interests of natural persons, the latter usually having an interest in protecting their dignity rather than their commercial success or viability. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
Is the AB respecting the same standard of review in all disputes (e.g., comparing the non-interventionist standard of review in EC - Hormones II with that in the zeroing disputes and the recent US – Tuna II 21.5 AB report)? [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:47 pm by Jenna N. Felz
GDPR The first is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which is expected to replace the existing Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Some people think that the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) is not working properly. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
Utility of Mediation in Sri Lanka by  Saranee Gunathilaka* Introduction Today, in Sri Lanka, mediation has become a coerced choice upon parties to a dispute. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 2:27 pm by Victoria Hordern
Additionally, the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (Directive) will be repealed on the day the GDPR becomes law. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:27 am
Is there anything interesting in the questions? [read post]