Search for: "In Re: Attorney Admission"
Results 641 - 660
of 3,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2018, 11:30 am
In re Jackson, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued August 29, 2017 (Docket No331632). [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:44 am
In sum, eligible claims must also meet four requirements: (1) they must be pending in the appeals process or within the timeframe to appeal; (2) the date of admission for the claim must have been prior to October 1, 2013; (3) the denial must be based on a patient status review; and (4) the claim must not have been previously withdrawn or re-billed for payment under Part B. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:43 am
It alleged that defendants falsely advertised that they’re in compliance with Section 503A of the FDCA, governing compounding. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
See In re J.P.B. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 5:15 am
After his affirmative admission, the game was on! [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 9:51 am
If you have (or may be subject to) a bar to re-enter the United States, it’s important to consult with an experienced immigration attorney. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 7:36 am
Now if you’re in immigration court the government shutdown is creating a huge backlog with cases that are in immigration court and if you do have a case where you are in Deportation proceedings you should check with the court and with your attorney on what is going on with your hearings because many hearings are being cancelled. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:42 pm
What I do want to point out is that the Court, in upholding the admission of a defendant’s independent test against the defendant, has turned independent testing into a double-edged sword. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 1:07 pm
Potentially, depending on when your employer laid you off, you could gain admission to a college or university and change your visa status from H-1B to F-1 student. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 6:51 am
In January of 2008 the 2d DCA ruled in In re Estate of McKibbin that a specific reference to the arbitration agreement in the DPOA was needed. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 8:26 am
They’re selling it for hundreds of dollars a vial. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:54 am
In re Capital Schools, Serial Nos. 86931396 and 87048675 (April 23, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Anthony R. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 4:04 am
The Board agreed with Examining Attorney Anthony Rinker that LG cannot rely on this cancelled registration since the disclaimer was an admission of mere descriptiveness at the time it was entered.LG next contended that its Supplemental Registration for DOOR-IN-DOOR “confirms Applicant’s use of the mark at least as early as June 2012. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 4:10 am
In re Apple Sugar, LLC, Serial No. 87330331 (December 31, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:12 am
Preserving Digital Evidence Preserving digital evidence is crucial to its admissibility in court. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:57 pm
In re United States, No. 09-2264 (7th Cir. 07/10/2009). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
I made notes of some great observations made by Dorsey Whitney attorney Jamie Nafziger at a legal seminar last week, and I thought I'd rework and share those notes here. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:42 pm
Examining Attorneys have discretion as to whether they require a disclaimer or not. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:42 pm
Examining Attorneys have discretion as to whether they require a disclaimer or not. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:38 am
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims get a pretty good workout in appeals, but they’re rarely successful. [read post]
