Search for: "In Re: Cross H." Results 641 - 660 of 926
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
” In re Davon H., 44 NE 3d 1144 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 5th Div. 2015(citations omitted) “The purpose of [Rule 213(f)]is to prevent unfair surprise at trial, without creating an undue burden on the parties before trial. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
The lesson for Minnesota district court judge Richard H. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 7:34 pm
”The stress is intensified by the contradictory messages and policies from European governments, which repeatedly made false comparisons of COVID-19 to seasonal flu to downplay the illness and try to force workers back to work to boost corporate profits in the middle of the pandemic.Monica Trombetta, a nurse working in Como, near Monza, told the press: “We’re very tired and afraid. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
Scotland, Northern Ireland), but is rather subject to re-examination by the competent court (e.g. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:38 am
In assessing how best to respond, they  will often be well advised to draw on not only expertise and cross-functional  consultation within the enterprise, but also to consult externally with credible,  independent experts, including from Governments, civil society, national  human rights institutions and relevant multi-stakeholder initiatives. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
  Cross-Program Changes to Size and Status Recertifications Another significant change is SBA’s proposal to delete the recertification requirements regarding size and status from the program-specific rules and add a new section (13 C.F.R. 125.12) that would impose uniformity around the impact of recertification. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:11 pm by Bill Marler
Case-patients were re-interviewed with a detailed hypothesis-generating questionnaire. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:05 am by Kenneth Anderson
 Let me just add in passing that I haven’t cross-posted this to the Opinio Juris blog as it is in the middle of a symposium that I don’t want to interrupt with outside posts.) [read post]