Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v."
Results 641 - 659
of 659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
: (MaRS),Copyright and trade mark trolls? [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:09 pm
Canadian Spaghnum Peat Moss Ass'n v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 7:33 am
In a case I worked on, XALATAN v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
His studies also show that fewer than 10% of child sex offenders re-offend--though recidivism is usually given as a reason for draconian measures against them. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 12:57 pm
Yesterday, as I looked for images of water pistols to use in the teaching of a patent law case (Larami v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
Kerr Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
While we almost always have questions relating to the plaintiff's treatment, usually what we're even more interested in is what the prescriber thinks of the drug itself.Was s/he already aware of the claimed risk? [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
And the undisputed evidence shows that the District has classified all apartment complexes as residential users under Res. 02-02. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
Madison Green Entertainment Sales Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:49 pm
GREEN BRANCH not merely descriptive for banking services. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
Green. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:34 am
Further to global warming (and Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
Private lawyers get better results not because they're better lawyers, but because defendants think they're better lawyers and are willing to pay for the difference.At Fight 'Em 'Til We Can't, tc has this conclusion:Whatever the case, prominent articles like this that speak to a national audience and say that public defenders aren't as "good" as private counsel are bound to fan the flames of PD-critics who claim we're not… [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 7:54 pm
Wentworth SSC Ltd v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:58 am
Green No. 94,162 Johnson CountyAngela KeckCapital murder (motion to withdraw plea)Issue #1: Denial of motion re: advances in arson scienceState v. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 4:36 am
Unlike BP, where the colour green was used only with the unregistered colour yellow, the applicant in HAVE A BREAK had used that slogan together with the registered mark KIT KAT but the ECJ felt that - taking its proverbial global view - the fact it had been used only with another mark did not mean that it could not acquire distinctiveness through use. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 12:11 pm
Until the Supreme Court's decision in June in Hamdan v. [read post]
