Search for: "In Re Asbestos Cases"
Results 641 - 660
of 862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
This case was brought to the attention of EPA by the U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:16 am
The court granted the motion and stayed the case, finding that federal court was the better forum. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:23 am
The operations of their development company, Kane Core, Inc., have been put on hold while their case is decided. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
Their lawsuit contended that Halliburton and Lesar committed fraud by falsifying financial results and by issuing misleading statements about its financial condition — on the company’s liability for claims of asbestos injury or death, about the adequacy of its reserves to cover asbestos liability, its ability to collect revenues on claims for construction contracts, and the benefits of its merge with Dresser Industries. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:04 am
In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon" in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, MDL No. 2179 (E.D. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:38 am
The many items you’re not allowed to bring into Detroit’s City Hall [Amy Alkon] Tags: asbestos, Detroit, Indian tribes, New York, product liability, prosecution Related posts Update: staking the Shinnecocks (0) Update: Indian sovereignty advances (0) The asbestos litigation machine (2) September 25 roundup (9) September 2001 archives, part 2 (0) [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
In one case, In re New York County Data Entry Worker Product Liability Litigation, No. 14003/92, 1994 WL 87529 (N.Y. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 12:53 pm
USF&G insured Western Asbestos from 1948 to 1960. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
After a lawsuit was commenced by the USF&G Parties against American Re and ECRA, each of the parties moved for summary judgment.In its motion for summary judgment, American Re argued that USF&G had paid claims for individuals who were exposed to asbestos not sold or distributed by Western MacArthur, and that USF&G bore the burden to prove that each claimant for whom it sought reimbursement was exposed to the asbestos of its insured. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:57 am
If you’re a contractor there is a good chance that there are state-level licensing requirements. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:17 pm
If you sift through their lawyer profiles, you’ll also see they’re a model for community involvement! [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
“There is no case law in Missouri to support plaintiff’s “failure to test” theory. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 4:25 am
Asbestos Litig., 134 F.R.D. at 37. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
Just give me as close to the case's name as possible and, if you're not sure of the name, essentially what it's about. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:00 pm
But in this case, the clinic went to the people. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:39 pm
You’re probably thinking, “How can this be? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
., have agreed to pay $25,000 for alleged violations of the federal Clean Air Act and National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
In those cases, the companies had not complied with federal stormwater permits and did not use measures to reduce the environmental impact of stormwater runoff from their construction sites. [read post]
