Search for: "In Re Doe's Adoption" Results 641 - 660 of 13,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2011, 1:13 am
  The tender does make it clear, however, that this sector remains on the Commission's radar. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
  The Commission generally does not grant extensions that would exceed 90 days from the original due date. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 10:31 am by Rania Combs
Estate planning for pets does not have to be complex. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
For most companies, if you’re approving or executing buybacks this quarter, it’s important to keep in mind that you’ll have to describe your actions in detail in your next Form 10-K or Form 10-Q – under the share repurchase disclosure amendments that the SEC adopted in May. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:06 am by INFORRM
I can see how this untruth gets perpetuated as it is everywhere – even Judges get it wrong, see Mostyn J  in Re D (a Child) [2014] EWHC 3388 (Fam) who seemed to think that only 3 out of 28 European Countries permitted ‘forced adoption’. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:16 am
Restricting where a person can live usually does little to ensure the safety of community members, she said. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:46 pm by Elijah Yip
(Photo credit: Wikipedia) “Smile, you’re on Candid Camera. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 12:39 am
Because the right to a jury trial is not constitutionally required in the juvenile context, its "absence ... does not automatically disqualify juvenile adjudications for purposes of the Apprendi exception. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:17 pm
Security Council finding of an act of aggression neither a non-State Party nor its nationals could be charged with the crime, permitted the U.S. delegation to join the adoption of the definition by consensus. -- Should the U.S. re-sign the Statute? [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:57 am by Jordan Bublick
Helvering, 312 U.S. 552 (1941) that “[o]rdinarily an appellate court does not give consideration to issues not raised below. [read post]