Search for: "In Re Phillips"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Today we’re not.While we don’t claim to know much about the specifics, we’re aware that the FDA is going (or maybe already has) to lower the classification of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (that mouthful is thankfully abbreviated "PTCA") catheters from Class III to Class II. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
If you're a reader of this blog, you're undoubtedly familiar with Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
Three justices (you need four for an outright majority) agreed in a concurring opinion in Phillips v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:44 am
We're not talking about expanding authority. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:05 am
The law we're here to implement recognises that religious identity is an essential part of this society. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Phillips (March 8, 2013) and In re Stephens (March 8, 2013) • In re Advanced Equities, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Phillips (March 8, 2013) and In re Stephens (March 8, 2013) • In re Advanced Equities, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:41 am
The 8th holds that the statute only applies if you’re in prison the whole time. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:24 am
I understand you're in the D.C. area. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:40 am
Basically, the moral of Phillips’ story is that if you’re shooting for a lesser sentence (Phillips’ attorney argued for probation), you're much better off if the record doesn't show you sending pictures of your genitalia to someone you think is a 12-year-old girl, and telling her it would be "hotter" if she was under 12. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:59 pm
On June 22, 2017, the district court found that Intervenor had satisfied the elements to pierce the corporate veil against Sedgwick, citing In re Phillips, 139 P.3d 639, 644 (Colo. 2006) and Martin v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Alade proposes re-evaluating liability frameworks to hold corporate directors and fintech firms accountable for the decisions of their algorithms. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:15 pm
Phillips and Mr. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
” In re Actos, 2013 WL 6328263 at *3. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 10:20 am
These do not rise to the level of ‘disclaimer’ but we’re never entirely sure whether the specification-forward approach of Phillips v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
We’re left with the essentials. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 3:30 pm
Reach out to the knowledgeable workplace discrimination attorneys at Phillips & Associates to learn more about what you can do to get what you deserve. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:20 pm
Rely on the New York disability discrimination attorneys at Phillips & Associates. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
Phillips, No. 11-0148/MC, the issue concerns what evidence the prosecution must present to prove the service discrediting element. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the issue of patent exhaustion — and that doesn’t mean people who are tired of hearing about patents. [read post]
