Search for: "In re: FACEBOOK PRIVACY LITIGATION" Results 641 - 660 of 763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2011, 5:40 pm by Colin O'Keefe
If that's not what you're looking for, every other post comments on a different area of the law. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:11 am by Gyi Tsakalakis
Here are some areas the synopsis covers: Lawyers ability to access Facebook information of a party other than their client in pending litigation. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Q: unusual names for children that are protectable as TMs—Facebook, Lex Luthor. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:45 am
“Imagine that Facebook didn’t get started for want of health insurance. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:27 am by Brian Wassom
  That allows every relevant department, including legal, to review those plans before they’re launched. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:30 am by Michael Scutt
Blogging and tweeting, in particular, encourages strong opinions and a controversial comment, especially if it involves a well known person or organisation could get re-tweeted or copied very quickly and widely. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:13 am by Thomas Econometrics
What if we’re involved in litigation – what’s discoverable and what’s not? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:32 am by Jon Hyman
– from Workplace Privacy Counsel Is The Jury Still Out On Social Media Background Checks? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Melina Padron
Juror communicating to defendant on Facebook guilty of contempt of court Case Comment: Re E [2011] UKSC 27 (child abduction case) « UKSC blog ?? [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:23 pm by Colin O'Keefe
We're bumping today's roundup to 15, leading off with a collection of the best Dukes v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:59 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Because we're so late, we're just going to jump right into the day's bests. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:45 am by Rob Robinson
http://t.co/qMFHgMI (Gina Passarella) eDiscovery Sanctions Awarded after Case Is Closed - http://t.co/B5cg361 (Derek Harris) Employer Concerns About NLRB Rulings on Facebook Speech - http://t.co/uUOQURm (Jeffrey Gordon) From the Experts: Bankruptcy and E-Discovery - http://tinyurl.com/3n8sf5c (Sarah Brown) Georgetown Academy Wrap Up - http://tinyurl.com/3gds2ww (Tom O'Connor) Going “Gaga” Over Big Deals and Malpractice in eDiscovery - http://t.co/YnfTycC (Ralph Losey) How… [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm by Justin Tenuto
What makes this sort of evidence so damning is that its written by the litigants themselves. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:12 am by Carolyn Elefant
After a lengthy hiatus, we’re back on track with our Shingular Sensations, where we focus on solos who have achieved important victories or are otherwise doing interesting work. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance eDiscovery News Content and Considerations 9th Circuit Rules E-Mail Is Not an 'Electronically Printed' Receipt - http://tinyurl.com/3ky74h2 (Nate Raymond) Bad eDiscovery Costs $60 Million Per Year - http://tinyurl.com/3z9lja6 (Lawdable) Careless Preservers Breathe Sigh of Relief when Court Finds no Relevant Info Destroyed - http://tinyurl.com/3kcewp4 (Michael Tucker) Catch Me if You Can: Guarding Firm Data From Insider Trading - http://tinyurl.com/3bfp969 (Tam… [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:37 am
” Because the users alleged the existence of a valid contract with Facebook, they could not maintain a claim for unjust enrichment.The decision is In re Facebook Privacy Litigation., CCH Guide to Computer Law ¶50,183.Further information about CCH Guide to Computer Law is available here. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:30 pm by Christopher Bird
This writer is genuinely not sure; on the one hand, laws like this do seem somewhat nanny-statish, but on the other hand firmly reminding people that their privacy can be at risk when participating in social media seems to be an obvious good. - Christopher Bird, TorontoVisit our Toronto Law Firm website: www.wiselaw.net TORONTO EMPLOYMENT LAW • TORONTO CIVIL LITIGATION & ESTATE LITIGATION • TORONTO FAMILY LAW & DIVORCE ORIGINALLY POSTED AT WISE LAW BLOG… [read post]