Search for: "In re Joseph V." Results 641 - 660 of 1,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The United States appeals Joseph Hairston's 60- month sentence, which was re-imposed by the district court on remand in light of United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate)   [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate)   [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:45 am
I've previously summarized my own testimony and other plaintiffs' witnesses' testimony in the New Jersey voting machines trial, Gusciora v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
: In re Jonathan Drew, Inc dba Drew Estate (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps National Association of Realtors - NAR alleges local real estate agents wrongly use REALTOR: National Association of Realtors v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Samuel Bray
See Final Decree, in Transcript of Re cord, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
No, says the European Court of Human Rights | BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bank of the United States (1824) and Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 10:49 am by Kevin
If it seems odd that there will (hopefully) soon be a case captioned Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) CAFC: Analogous art test as the new structure for non-obviousness determinations: In re Klein (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) CAFC vacates preliminary injunction where District Court applied incorrect claim construction: Kimberly-Clark v. [read post]