Search for: "In re M. C." Results 641 - 660 of 9,261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2022, 4:05 am
[C]ommitting to the cane was the most terrifying development yet, because it meant my secret was out.... [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:46 am by Ryan Goodman
“I’m from a part of the country where people justify the actions of slavery, the Klu Klux Klan, and lynching,” Rep. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 12:16 pm by Andreea Rusu
L’auteure désire remercier Marc-Antoine Jutras, stagiaire en droit, pour son aide dans la préparation de cet article [1] 2022 QCCA 903. [2] RLRQ c A-3.001. [3] RLRQ c T-15.1. [4] Soulières c. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Pour la dernière semaine, les trois décisions en français les plus consultées ont été: Pharmaciens (Ordre professionnel des) c. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:27 pm by Stacie Rosenzweig
Coaching your client to lie can implicate SCR 20:3.3(3) (candor toward the tribunal/offering evidence the lawyer knows to be false—depositions count), SCR 20:3.4(b) (counseling a witness to testify falsely), SCR 20:8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty), at least. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:04 am by Marie-Thérèse Eugénio
Pour mémoire, le principe en droit du travail est le caractère préalable de la consultation, à savoir que le CSE doit être consulté avant toute prise de décision de l’employeur. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 3:21 pm
Ainsi, les faits dont la société mère a connaissance sont opposables à la société fille lorsque les deux entités juridiques disposent d'une banque de données électronique commune et emploient les mêmes collaborateurs (cf. arrêt 5C.104/2001 du 21 août 2001 consid. 4c/bb et les références). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Saraphin Dhanani
” Herein lies the core problem when 1512(c)(2) is interpreted beyond the plain meaning of the text: “You’re going down a path where you’re going to end up with no one really knowing what this means. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Parisien c. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:19 pm by Patricia Hughes
Rather, I’m thinking about blatantly (and often loudly but sometimes secretly) ignoring constitutional requirements or making it clear that these actors intend to upend the constitutional process, structure or expectations. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:56 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  This should be one of the many “additional factors” considered by the Department of Labor and specifically listed in the final rule in 29 C.F.R. section 795.110(b)(7). c. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
There's going to be days where you're going to be a B-I-T-C-H and there's going to be days where [the female servers] [are] going to be anxious and flip out and you need to be able to calm them down and get them what they need and not taking things personally so that they don't reflect of an image of you that may not be fully accurate.Plaintiff replied, “Yeah and my only thing is, and this may sound a little obnoxious, but I'm just going to… [read post]