Search for: "In re Morrison"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 9:50 pm
Val Kilmer (way wilder than Jim Morrison) 30. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
"Read our recent roundup covering the new stakes for employee misclassification in California>> --We're also seeing rising interest in legal commentary to do with the approval of final regulations in California cap-and-trade program. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Res. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
We’ve been in our new office for nearly six months, and we haven’t found a big enough Jim Morrison poster to cover our massive white walls (seriously, we have more than 2000 sq. ft. of wall space). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Res. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Preovolos, Morrison & Foerster LLP Dr. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In In re Soc Gen Sec Litig, 2010 WL 3910286 (SDNY 2010), a post-Morrison case, Judge Richard Berman held that trades in ADRs (American Depository Receipts) are "predominantly foreign transactions" (a quote from pre-Morrison caselaw) and as such fall outside the reach of Rule 10b-5. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/q1UD5l (Fulbright) Socially Aware: The Social Media Law Update (PDF) http://bit.ly/mQIDCt (Morrison & Foerster) Six Provocations for Big Data – http://bit.ly/nZh1pb (Danah Boyd, Kate Crawford) The History of Digital #Storage [INFOGRAPHIC] http://on.mash.to/purTmv (Matt Silverman) The Sequence and Chronology of Meet and Confer – http://bit.ly/p2OPlS (Orange Legal Technologies) Tracking the Trackers: Where Everybody Knows Your Username –… [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am
http://bit.ly/q1UD5l (Fulbright) Socially Aware: The Social Media Law Update (PDF) http://bit.ly/mQIDCt (Morrison & Foerster) Six Provocations for Big Data – http://bit.ly/nZh1pb (Danah Boyd, Kate Crawford) The History of Digital #Storage [INFOGRAPHIC] http://on.mash.to/purTmv (Matt Silverman) The Sequence and Chronology of Meet and Confer – http://bit.ly/p2OPlS (Orange Legal Technologies) Tracking the Trackers: Where Everybody Knows Your Username –… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am
Where when you look at Lopez, when I say hey’re basically the same case, I think the Supreme Court in Raich said they’re very similar, similar circumstances, okay, and I understand there are nuances to everything, is that when you look at Lopez and Morrison, the Court said, you know, the line is drawn between economic and non-economic activity. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
Car accidents in Westwood are nothing new, especially if you're talking about the ones we see on East Street. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 am
http://bit.ly/q1UD5l (Fulbright) Socially Aware: The Social Media Law Update (PDF) http://bit.ly/mQIDCt (Morrison & Foerster) Six Provocations for Big Data – http://bit.ly/nZh1pb (Danah Boyd, Kate Crawford) The History of Digital #Storage [INFOGRAPHIC] http://on.mash.to/purTmv (Matt Silverman) The Sequence and Chronology of Meet and Confer – http://bit.ly/p2OPlS (Orange Legal Technologies) Tracking the Trackers: Where Everybody Knows Your Username –… [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:20 am
Some of these players are not just trying to deprive your associates of jobs, they're trying to come directly between you and your clients. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 6:38 pm
Both the late rocker Jim Morrison and the equally late comedian Richard Pryor, for example, lived over-the-top lives and also asserted that, “No one gets out of here alive. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
In June 2010, in Morrison v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:47 am
That's why it saddens me to see the latest iteration of the Morrison Foerster website. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm
It’s not like they’re making him sit at the back of the store with the other fatties. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:52 am
Bill Staar is a partner in the Boston office of Morrison Mahoney LLP. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:32 am
As one reviewer put it, "This is no re-release, compilation or collection of rarities that might have appeared somewhere a long time ago. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:00 am
But though we can’t hear you from your computer (we don’t work for LoJack) we’ll just assume you’re curious about a legal analysis of the case. [read post]
