Search for: "In the Interest of SB"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2012, 7:26 pm
I was particularly interested in this provision. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:13 am
That's nearly impossible in the short term unless some law drastically slashes benefits (either medical or indemnity or both) - for example when SB 899 in California was passed, carrier combined ratios plummeted.But these ratios increased rather quickly in California as SB 899 worked its way through the courts and the various parts of the workers' compensation machine refined their systems and operations to take advantage of new areas of vagaries and opportunities.I interpret all… [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:15 am
If the court applies strict scrutiny, the bills would be presumptively unconstitutional and may be upheld only by proof that they are narrowly tailored to serve compelling state interests. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 8:50 am
"I thought we came to a final decision and a resolution last session, and I'm interested in moving forward, not moving backwards. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:59 am
Over the past decade, the local food revival in the U.S. has gained tremendous momentum, with more consumers interested in where their food comes from, how it's grown, and who does the growing. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:53 am
Would have required the governor and three cabinet members to place personal assets into blind trusts to avoid conflicts of interests when passing legislation, which will directly benefit them. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:53 am
Would have required the governor and three cabinet members to place personal assets into blind trusts to avoid conflicts of interests when passing legislation, which will directly benefit them. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 4:57 pm
The court reasoned that since SB 14 does not violate a constitutionally protected interest, it can be found unconstitutional only if it is not rationally related to a legitimate government interest. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:44 pm
Maybe the interrelationship between CEQA and SB 375 is so complex that hope for greater clarity and simplicity in this area is unrealistic. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
Here's an interesting development. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:18 pm
Indiana also has two bills under consideration, SB 373 and SB 391. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 1:29 pm
SB 376 ultimately did not pass the Florida Senate and consequently did not become law. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 12:23 pm
SB 10 is a much less sweeping bill. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
We will work to protect your financial interests as well as your future rights as a landlord or tenant. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:32 pm
Berman will be seeking to draw out the underlying reasons behind their positions in an effort to have those interests and their reasoning be better understood, to diffuse the conflict, and to attempt to enter into a consensus-building, problem-solving dialogue by working with the common interests that they and their constituents may share. [read post]
19 Apr 2006, 11:54 am
The California Supreme Court addressed the problem in the LaMusga decision in April, 2004 by making it clear that courts can prevent children from being moved when it is detrimental to their interests. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 10:57 am
His SB 1448 is similar or identical (I didn't see a significant difference, but didn't look closely) to legislation passed out of the Senate in 2005. [read post]
8 May 2016, 11:34 am
The policy statement allows for rejection where acceptance of the OIC may in any way be detrimental to the interest of fair tax administration, even though it is shown conclusively that the amount offered is greater than could be collected by other means, provided no effective tax administration issues exist. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 3:57 pm
The new law, codified in California Civil Code section 2923, extends SB 1079’s protections until January 1, 2031. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 9:36 am
Code art. 127); An assignee or sublessee of a renewable energy lease would become directly responsible to the original lessor to the extent of the interest acquired (compare to La. [read post]
