Search for: "Insurance Provider 2" Results 641 - 660 of 25,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2010, 7:34 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is further set out in the Texas Insurance Code, Section 542.051(2). [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 4:08 am by Laura Hodgson (UK)
For insurers, the Climate Biennial Exploratory Scenario will provide the PRA with a better view of the risks that insurance companies face. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 10:29 am by Deb Givens
The McCarran-Ferguson Act, in part, provided an exemption for insurance companies from federal antitrust laws for conduct that constituted the “business of insurance,” as long as it was “subject to state regulation” and did not constitute an act of “boycott, coercion, or intimidation. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 9:01 pm by Chad W. Johnson
Co., 2 P.3d 510 (Wyo. 2000), the court held that a reservation letter cannot unilaterally change an insurance contract. [read post]
HHS is encouraging all stakeholders, including health care providers, associations, insurers, patients, and others, to submit comments to the proposed rule. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 3:05 am by Jared Scholtz
It reads: No (re)insurer shall be deemed to provide cover and no (re)insurer shall be liable to pay any claim or provide any benefit hereunder to the extent that the provision of such cover, payment of such claim or provision of such benefit would expose that (re)insurer to any sanction, prohibition or restriction under United Nations resolutions or the trade or economic sanctions, laws or regulations of the European Union, United Kingdom or United States… [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
However, courts are providing more and more guidance for insurers of companies who find themselves targeted by disaster. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 11:32 am
  Defendant’s policy contained an omnibus clause which provided coverage to (1) relatives by blood, marriage, or adoption, and (2) drivers given permission by the named insured. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm by Mark K. Payne
They should cover (1) discrimination, sexual harassment, and wrongful termination; (2) defamation; (3) publishers liability and copyright infringement; (4) coverage for failure to provide adequate or proper insurance; (5) provide a duty to defend; (6) coverage for the association’s manager as an additional insured (this is often a requirement under the management contract); (7) provide defense costs outside the limits of the D & O… [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:31 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  Plaintiff alleges that Sewell (1) did not prepare any estimates or scopes of damages to the property or failed to provide those reports to the insured, (2) failed to hire any qualified experts to appropriately assess the damage, (3) delayed the claims process and failed to communicate with the insured, and (4) misrepresented the Policy’s coverage. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:52 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  Florida has a similar program for mediations to resolve property insurance claims, as provided for by statute and rule (also see the brochure used by the Florida Department of Financial Services, which regulates insurance companies). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:57 am by John L. Welch
The mark LIFE INSURANCE FOR LIVING is incongruous because life insurance is not for living; it provides a death benefit for the insured’s survivors. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:00 am by Cynthia Pasciuto
The current medical debt crisis in the United States is overburdening bankruptcy court.[1] Debtors are filing bankruptcy because they are unable to pay their medical debts.[2] An insurance mandate will not provide enough assistance for those with insurance and without insurance to eliminate all medical debt and avoid bankruptcy. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 4:02 am by Cari Rincker
Finally, the policy likely excludes property damage by the insured him/herself. 2. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:57 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
United has advised the department that it has voluntarily reprocessed claims dating back to February 2018 to provide benefits for claims denied based solely on a participant’s failure to provide evidence of insurability. [read post]