Search for: "Irish v. Irish"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 5:00 am
Both arguments are bolstered by reference to the €1,250,000 damages award in Leech v Independent Newspapers [2014] IESC 79 (19 December 2014). [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
TJ McIntyre, a lecturer in the UCD Sutherland School of Law, has published an article in the Irish Independent entitled “Irish law needs urgent update for digital age to give worldwide users protection over data”. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:33 am
As the U.K. government prepares itself for the beginning of Brexit negotiations in March 2017, it is becoming increasingly clear that there is no off-ramp—and, for that matter, no brakes on the car. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm
Michael Ryan admitted to obtaining access to personal information held by the Department of Social Protection while he was employed by a firm of solicitors acting on behalf of Allied Irish Banks (AIB) and Bank of Ireland. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
This proposed amendment was not challenged by the DoH.The Scottish, N Irish and Welsh health authorities did not oppose Servier's application to amend. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
Ireland In the case of Ryanair Ltd v Fleming ([2016] IECA 265) the Irish Court of Appeal held that the natural forum for a libel claim against an Australian pilot by Ryanair was Australia. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 2:54 pm
Laster’s September 19, 2016 opinion in Judy v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
InFacts v Daily Express. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note Clarke v… [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Irish cases subsequent to the Ryanair applications have shown the breadth of the Norwich Pharmacal jurisdiction (seeEMI v UPC [2013] IEHC 274 (12 June 2013) [cp EMI v Eircom [2005] 4 IR 148,[2005] IEHC 233 (8 July 2005)]; O’Brien v Red Flag Consulting Ltd [2015] IEHC 867 (21 December 2015); Petroceltic v Aut O’Mattic (above); see also Various Claimants v News Group Newspapers [2014] 1 Ch 400, [2013] EWHC 2119 (Ch) (12 July 2013)). [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:28 pm
In Carroll v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
These reports include some of the international challenges faced by IP, Katfriend David Lim's account of being a Congress first-timer, and a delicious recipe.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 113 [week ending on Sunday 11 September] Clinical trial data | Parody and free use in Germany | Infringing donuts | CJEU decision in GS Media | Fujifilm Kyowa v AbbVie | UK and the UPC | General Data Protection… [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
This was the question facing the UK Information Tribunal recently in Queen Mary University of London v (1) The Information Commissioner and (2) Alem Matthees. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
A closer look at Hospira v Cubist and daptomycin micellesIPKat returns to the Hospira v Cubist case to look in more detail at the claim relating to purifying daptomycin by altering by PH.* My My Mylan: The Trademark Silver Lining for Mylan's EPIPENMylan has recently come under fire for raising the price of the EPIPEN. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
In Goodman v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
| Weekly roundup: Friday Fun Never too late 107 [week ending on Sunday 31 July] Article 28 declarations |Costs of ISP blocking injunctions |Friday Fantasies, featuring legal challenges to Brexit and more |Huawei v Samsung |Hospira v Genentech |Questions on Article 3(b) SPC referred to CJEU |Book Review: Trade Secret Protection |Pokémon Go [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:41 am
. * Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive mandates a substantive change, says Irish Court of AppealThe InfoSoc Directive was found to introduce changes allowing graduated response systems as a form of injunction - independently of a finding of their liability, said Hogan J in Sony Music Entertainment Ireland Ltd & Ors v UPC Communications Ireland Ltd. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 1:02 pm
Giordano v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:18 am
In this respect the question becomes whether Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive as transposed into Irish law by s40(5A) of the Copyright and Related Rights Act (CRRA) has changed the general principle that Irish courts have no jurisdiction to grant an injunction against a defendant who has committed no cognisable legal wrong or where such a wrong is not threatened. [read post]
