Search for: "Ives v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 7,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
AP involved the Immigration Rules, para 276ADE(1)(iv) and whether it would not be reasonable to expect a child with continuous residence of at least seven years to leave the UK. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
In Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:57 am
In Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
(quoting Mozes v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:59 am
First is State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
Notwithstanding the Court's citation of Ashwander v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 2:36 pm
The European Commission’s proposals for the CRR II Regulation and the CRD V Directive contain revisions to the Capital Requirements Regulation (Regulation 575/2013) (CRR) and the CRD IV Directive (2013/36/EU) respectively. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
Matter of Ventillo v County of Rockland Sheriff's Dept. 2022 NY Slip Op 03521 Decided on June 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
Matter of Ventillo v County of Rockland Sheriff's Dept. 2022 NY Slip Op 03521 Decided on June 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
Matter of Ventillo v County of Rockland Sheriff's Dept. 2022 NY Slip Op 03521 Decided on June 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:57 am
Matter of Ventillo v County of Rockland Sheriff's Dept. 2022 NY Slip Op 03521 Decided on June 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 10:36 am
The statute is 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv), which criminalizes encouraging or inducing an alien to reside in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:48 am
Perry v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:47 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 16 provides that the requested State shall represent the requesting State in any proceedings in the requested State arising out of a request for extradition. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 9:04 am
In our submission, we address: (i) the importance of the decision and task of the Court, (ii) the reasons why the states should be held accountable for collateral over-blocking of the websites by private parties, (iii) importance of specific legal basis as to the target and means of blocking, (iv) the need to observe the principle of proportionality in grant and implementation of website blocking and (v) available remedies against the abuse of website blocking. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 5:45 pm
In our submission, we address: (i) the importance of the decision and task of the Court, (ii) the reasons why the states should be held accountable for collateral over-blocking of the websites by private parties, (iii) importance of specific legal basis as to the target and means of blocking, (iv) the need to observe the principle of proportionality in grant and implementation of website blocking and (v) available remedies against the abuse of website blocking. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
The structure of s 117B(6) is straightforward because it unambiguously states that there is no public interest in removal where a person has a genuine and subsisting parental relationship with a qualifying child and it would not be reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:16 pm
The latter ruling was presaged earlier in the term by Philip Morris v. [read post]
