Search for: "JANE DOES 1-2" Results 641 - 660 of 1,000
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
It does such things as produce this amusing graph. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:25 pm
In this example, Brian has an interest in the property on the death of the will-maker, he does not get possession until Jane’s death. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
                        Lunch 1-2:30 p.m. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:58 pm by Christina Tarr
Once the data is on the web, where does it reside? [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:22 am by Cathy
Day 1: In the beginning (San Francisco to Santa Cruz – 82.5 miles) At mile 0. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:28 pm
The suit has also named several Jane Does as defendants, a legal tactic commonly used as a placeholder when the identities of defendants are unknown. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
  Table of Contents   Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:20 am by Susan Brenner
Free speech rights aside, professional women . . . do not need the [Jane Does] of the planet eroding their hard earned respect in the marketplace. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
In my discussions elsewhere about the PGP demonstrations, some have suggested that re-identification requires little or no ethical justification where (1) participants have been warned about the risk of re-identification; (2) participants have given blanket consent to all research uses of the data they make publicly available; and/or (3) the re-identification researchers are scholars rather than commercial or criminal actors. [read post]
19 May 2013, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  The video is worth checking out: Vaknin seems to be most concerned with the speed of the results, but since at most we are talking about the difference between 1 second and 2 seconds, I don't see speed as a major difference. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
Doe 1 moved the trial court to (1) quash a subpoena that Cooley obtained in California seeking his identity, and (2) issue a protective order. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1,… [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am by Terry Hart
The Copyright Act defines performing a work publicly in the following manner: (1) to perform6 … it at a place open to the public or at any place where a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances is gathered; or (2) to transmit7 or otherwise communicate a performance … of the work to a place specified by clause (1) or to the public, by means of any device or process, whether the… [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 10:31 am by Jeff Kosseff
  Defendant John Doe 1, who operated a website about the law school, sought a protective order and moved to quash the subpoena to his Internet service provider. [read post]