Search for: "Jefferson v Long" Results 641 - 660 of 745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2009, 12:11 am
There, the defendant rigged a shotgun inside an old farm house long unoccupied. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am by Steve
Pa. 2001) (granting summary judgment); Long v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 12:55 am
We think of that as a relic of the past, but it's not that long ago that the Supreme Court first decided, in New York Times v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  The practice operated out of three leased offices in Smithtown, Port Jefferson and Commack on Long Island. [read post]
Aug. 28, 2009)(Jefferson) (workers comp claim; deadline for contesting compensability) STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
State's Ultimate Insider Indicted, by Jeff Coen, Ray Long and John ChaseChicago Tribune (Oct. 31, 2008). [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
Perhaps the most rigorous defender of the original intentions version of originalism has been Richard Kay in a series of very careful articles.Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 7:00 pm
  For example, abortion was not seen as a hot Supreme Court issue when any of the justices who decided Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:03 am
The decisions of the Commissioner of Education in Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373, and Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd 14,396. illustrate this concept.The Irving is posted on the Internet at: [www.counsel.nysed.gov]The Fusco decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.counsel.nysed.gov]The Fetterly decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us] [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:03 pm
" So said Congress, so says the law, and so said the Supreme Court in Diamond v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
A tarrif applied by the Port Authority (which is not the MTA) to the Bridgeport / Port Jefferson Ferry has been ruled constitutional only so long as the proceeds to directly to benefit the passengers of the ferry. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:11 am
Jefferson, No. 08-30067 (5-26-09). [read post]