Search for: "Jeffrey Price" Results 641 - 660 of 1,192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants are charged with engaging in a scheme to manipulate the publicly quoted share price and trading volume of OPTZ common stock. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:17 pm by Lara
 Price premiums also serve as a deterrent to good purchasing behavior since this is more of a punishment than a reward. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Michael B. Stack
He also recommends each rate group should pay the full current and future costs of new claims, which the WSIB must accurately price. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:09 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
This is done without clearly establishing the underlying market mechanisms (i.e. elasticity of demand) and assuming that increasing the supply of ships for other routes in the North American market would have no price and revenue impacts. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:03 pm
This posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:30 am by Jeffrey May
The report identifies recurring themes heard at the workshops: market concentration, merger enforcement, monopsony, bid rigging, potential market manipulation, market transparency, captive ownership, contracting, regulatory burdens, low or volatile prices for agricultural commodities, high input prices, a lack of capital, and a variety of issues with genetically modified seeds. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:22 am
The Globe and Mail has won a $165,000 costs award after an unsuccessful attempt by a University of Toronto law professor to unmask the source of a business story on the 2008 attempted leveraged buyout of BCE Inc.In the summer of 2008, a numbered company owned solely by Jeffrey MacIntosh, a professor who specializes in corporate and securities law, took a $36,000 loss on BCE call options that he had hoped may result in a $500,000 windfall.MacIntosh purchased the call options in mid-June… [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:01 am
The agency agreements included clauses that granted Apple "most favored nation" pricing guarantees--to eliminate price competition among e-book retailers. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:32 am by Rob Robinson
 to the Legal Industry – http://bit.ly/KWpLLT (Todd Haley) Shining a Light into the Black Box of eDiscovery Predictive Coding – bit.ly/K5DBKP (Matthew Nelson) Spoliation Equals Case Dismissal for Plaintiffs in NY Case - bit.ly/KdTe2y (Mike Hamilton) Successful Predictive Coding Adoption is Dependent on Effective InfoGovernance – bit.ly/LklcGG (Bill Tolson) Technology Assisted Review Backgrounder | Updated Through May 29, 2012 – bit.ly/IiTGtb… [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:35 pm by Stanford Law Review
Hoffman, Donald Braman, Danieli Evans & Jeffrey J. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:15 pm
This posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.An action brought by the State of Mississippi against companies that manufacture liquid crystal display (LCD) panels for conspiring to fix prices in violation of the Mississippi state law was remanded to state court by the federal district court in Jackson. [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:16 am by Jeffrey May
by Jeffrey May Earlier this month, the Kansas Supreme Court ruled that the reasonableness of a vertical price fixing agreement is not to be considered when determining whether such an agreement violates the Kansas Restraint of Trade Act (KRTA). [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:20 am by Justin P. Webb
"  The price is relatively steep, and it's a pay 50% beforehand, pay 50% afterward type of deal. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:56 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Fort allegedly hid information from the short sale lender, including that Fort had arranged for an immediate resale to a nominee buyer at a price significantly higher than the short sale price and based on an inflated appraisal and that he would profit from the resale. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:56 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Fort allegedly hid information from the short sale lender, including that Fort had arranged for an immediate resale to a nominee buyer at a price significantly higher than the short sale price and based on an inflated appraisal and that he would profit from the resale. [read post]