Search for: "John Elwood"
Results 641 - 660
of 674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2018, 5:11 am
Why, it was just last month—no, wait, it was in 2012—that I last mentioned “curtilage,” after it was mentioned in John Elwood’s “Relist & Hold” column at SCOTUSblog. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:40 am
So on the whole I think the Court was probably wise to stick to the narrow ground. 3) Obvious congrats to co-blogger John Elwood for the victory. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:13 am
As this blog’s John Elwood has explained, this doctrine, known as Munsingwear vacatur, is based on the theory that “the party seeking review shouldn’t be stuck with a decision it was trying to overturn when it lost that opportunity through no fault of its own. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
” Marcia Coyle notes at the BLT that the case elicited Justice Sotomayor’s first dissenting opinion, while Bloomberg, Courthouse News Service, and John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy have further analysis. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The Court will hold a “clean-up Conference” today (see John Elwood’s post for more details), with orders to be announced tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am
Sikkelee; John Elwood, the author of this blog’s Relist Watch, is among the counsel to the petitioner in the Georgia case. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:28 am
That said, as Volokh Conspiracy’s John Elwood pointed out, “While the settlement ends this case, this is not the last we’ve seen of this issue. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:18 am
” At Vinson & Elkins’ Lincoln’s Law Blog, John Elwood and others look at a new cert petition in a False Claims Act case. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:13 pm
John Elwood (known to you perhaps from his authorship of this blog’s “Relist Watch” feature) presents a powerful argument that the WSLA applies only to criminal charges, starting with the common usage of “offense” and continuing through the placement of the WSLA in Title 18 (the federal criminal code) and the statute’s long history, which for almost a century explicitly limited itself to offenses that were “indictable. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:39 am
Arguing for the federal government will be Assistant to the Solicitor General John F. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:12 am
” At SCOTUSblog, John Elwood tracks the relisted cases from Monday’s order list. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:33 am
(As this blog’s John Elwood reported, a post on CEI’s website “compared Mann to another famous Penn State faculty member, former football coach Jerry Sandusky, who had recently been convicted of sexual misconduct. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am
” [Disclosure: John Elwood, a regular contributor to this blog, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
If someone were to call John Doe on the telephone and say that he plans to blow up Doe’s child’s school today, then Doe would probably feel extremely scared, keep his child home from school, and maybe also notify the school office of the threat and thereby motivate the school to close for the day, pending a bomb squad clearance of the school grounds. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:50 am
According to John Elwood, the likelihood that a typical cert petition will get granted is in the 2-4 percent range, whereas the odds for a relisted petition climb to 45 percent. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:30 am
[Today's oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
[Disclosure: I mooted John Elwood, counsel for petitioner in this case, but I had no other involvement in the case.] [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:22 pm
Speaking of oral argument, this week’s arguments will feature Supreme Court veterans like David Boies, Tom Goldstein (of this blog), and John Elwood (also of this blog). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
For additional commentary, see John Elwood’s comment below. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 2:44 pm
Both news organizations reported that CIA General Counsel Courtney Elwood held a series of telephone conversations with lawyers for both the Justice Department and the White House, during which she provided at least a general description of the allegations. [read post]
