Search for: "John J Downes" Results 641 - 660 of 2,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On 30 October, Nicklin J handed down judgment in Rayner v Seabourne-Hawkins [2020] EWHC 2895 (QB). [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
For the past five years, I have been writing columns and giving speeches warning that Donald Trump is an existential threat to constitutional democracy. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Consider the person who arrives late to work and lies about a car being broken down to preserve their employment. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Occasionally it gets bogged down in philosophical discussions, though in most instances these concepts complement the text very effectively. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
In the op-ed pages of the New York Times: John Fabian Witt (Yale Law School) writes about how courts have historically responded to challenges to public health laws -- and how they are doing so today ("Republican Judges Are Quietly Upending Public Health Laws").In the Washington Post's "Made by History" section: Bruce J. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The reach of @CopJrCliff and other fake accounts from supposed Black Trump supporters highlights how an account can be effective at pushing misleading narratives in just a few days – faster than Twitter can take it down. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Kevin Kaufman
[1] Key Findings An ideal tax code is one that is simple, transparent, neutral, and stable, but many states, including Nebraska, have certain tax provisions that depart from these principles of sound tax policy. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  But in its absence, why in the world would California electors choose to vote for, say, Donald J. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 7:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The list included the likes of John Roberts, Miguel Estrada, and Jeff Sutton. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Because he knows that he is going to try to use the courts to reverse the people’s verdict against him in this year’s election.Having another of Mitch McConnell’s pre-screened nominees on the Supreme Court—and to be clear, there is no reason that Senate Democrats should view Trump’s nominee as a flesh-and-bones human being, because McConnell certainly sees all of these people as interchangeable—could, indeed, make the difference in post-election litigation.I… [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 2:51 pm by Ilya Somin
But it leaves no doubt where the court comes down on the latter score. [read post]