Search for: "Johns v State"
Results 641 - 660
of 22,141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2015, 3:11 pm
On December 2, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inGobeille v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:02 pm
John Wiley Price and the Dallas County Commissioners Court don't appear fazed by the news, but the Texas Task Force on Indigent Defense today issued a report (pdf) analyzing the Dallas public defender office appellate division and caseloads at the state's largest PD office.Countering Price's critique, the TFID found the appellate division cost the county $72 per hour of billable work compared to the $100 paid to private attorneys. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
In Panetti v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 6:36 am
Montana State Auditor’s Office, News Release (March 31, 2008) Montana State Auditor John [...] [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:30 am
Judgment WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 12, and statement by Titus Trust on reaching a settlement with three men “who have suffered for many years because of the appalling abuse of John Smyth”. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:00 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:45 am
Baker v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:14 am
That compensation law is one thing Texas does right compared to other states. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 6:47 pm
For this case to be similar to Missouri v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:47 am
A helpful illustration of this concept appears in Swenson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm
Then in its 2012 Miller v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:30 am
The Court stated that the Plaintiff must move forward and sue each Defendant separately. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
“Gibbons v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:27 am
Virginia and Brooke v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
That's Burns v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:01 pm
Today, in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
The court summarizes the allegations: Plaintiffs John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 allege that when they were thirteen years old they were solicited and recruited for sex trafficking and manipulated into providing to a third-party sex trafficker pornographic videos (“the Videos”) of themselves through the social media platform Snapchat. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
The e-mails were sent by `John Doe’ with the e-mail address hoodbox@yahoo.com.Four e-mails were sent to the Oswego police department or Unger. [read post]
