Search for: "Kay v. Kay" Results 641 - 660 of 1,007
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2011, 6:19 am by David Oscar Markus
Julie Kay wrote a story on a funny email exchange that has been making the rounds. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:43 am by Lara
  The ENTREPRENEUR HALL OF FAME has inducted the likes of such well known entrepreneurs as Mary Kay Ash, Anita Roddick, Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, among others. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm by NL
Beedles v Guinness Northern Counties Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 442 This was the appeal of the first instance decision in Mr Beedle’s claim under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Section 24C. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:05 am by J
It’s the costs fall-out from Price v Leeds CC [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465 (the other case with Kay v LB Lambeth). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:50 am by sally
Toki v Ipourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton (Case C-424/09); [2011] WLR (D) 128 “The mechanisms for the recognition of higher education diplomas pursuant to article 3(b) of Council Directive 89/48/EEC, as amended, were applicable where the profession at issue was a regulated professional activity within the meaning of the second sub-paragraph of article 1(d) of the Directive in the member state of origin, irrespective of whether the person concerned was or was not a… [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 1:07 pm
Analysis:After a lengthy discussion of corporations, general partnerships and LLCs, the Court framed the principal issues on appeal as (1) whether Plaintiffs may assert individual claims against Kay and (2) whether Plaintiffs may bring derivative claims on behalf of the partnerships and LLCs against Kay.(1) Individual ClaimsApplying logic from Shenker v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:44 am
Fresh on the heels of yesterday's expose, our own Bob V tipped me to this debacle:"Surgeons say patients in some parts of England have spent months waiting in pain because of delayed operations or new restrictions on who qualifies for treatment. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:09 am by Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal
  For more information, please email Susan Kai (s-kai2012@nlaw.northwestern.edu). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:25 am by Eric
’” Kai Falkenberg: She is closely following the pending lawsuit Parisi v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am by INFORRM
One aspect of this issue was covered in my post on the  case of Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:20 pm by Simon Gibbs
Ward LJ, giving the leading judgment said: “I prefer the view of the respondent that the Court of Appeal remains bound by the decision of the House of Lords: see Kay v Lambeth LBC [2006] UKHL 10, [2006] 2 A.C. 465. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
Miller & Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure §§ 2716, 2720 (3d ed. 1998). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:25 am by Susan Brenner
Kay Hoagland. . . . saw a pedestrian . . . . go out into the intersection and she saw a white SUV strike him in lane number one, next to the left turn lane. . . . [read post]