Search for: "Keene v. Keene"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2013, 1:51 am
Karpov v Kasparov (1985): black to play and win The art assets of the game are protected as artistic works. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:03 am
The roundtable discussion was on the recent decisions of Nigeria’s Supreme Court (SC) in Adeokin v MCSN and Compact Disc v MCSN on the locus standi (right of action) of collective management organisations (CMOs) under the Nigerian Copyright Act. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:47 pm
Whether you are a keen copyright historian or merely interested in contemporary debates about journalism, this book is for you. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:42 am
Senior was keen that Chinese law should apply to the dispute, but the judge agreed with Celgard that English law should apply. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:51 am
Naturally, having followed closely the streaming inquiry, this Kat was keen to read chapter 3 on ownership, licensing, equitable remuneration and the copyright tribunal. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:20 am
If I were telling a history of case law, I would address the two legal issues at issue in Kelly v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am
Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:52 am
Related PostsFebruary 28, 2012 -- R v Haddock: The Death of Supergrass Trials (again)? [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:26 pm
Read the opinion here: Atwater v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm
You can read the posts on Marilyn’s blog here (both by Julian Hawkshead) : A feast of legal issues: the X v X divorce (part 1) and here : X v X: special contributions and discounted share values (part 2). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Keene Corp., 628 A.2d 710, 717-19 (N.J. 1993); Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:30 am
The first thing to point out is that whilst Lord Leggatt was keen to point out that the wording of the GDPR was of no assistance to the court in reaching its decision concerning the old law under the DPA 1998, the reasoning applies in full to the new regime. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:55 am
Supreme Court ruling in Frye v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:53 am
Merpel is unhappy in general about the conclusions relating to likelihood of confusion: if the relevant consumer of Specsavers' and Asda's optician services has poor eyesight, is he or she not more likely to be confused by the similarities in overall appearance between the two than the keen-sighted Mr Justice Mann? [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Startley v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 9:11 pm
*Baze v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:24 pm
Of course, with the recently decided Richard v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm
Although the Daily Star and Ms Sitham are keen to point out that it could be loyal fans of Cole who fall foul of the law, the terms of the injunction, though wide-ranging, are in fact standard practice for curbing harassing behaviour of paparazzi photographers, and not that of the general public. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 12:02 am
From his opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 1:05 pm
Todd v. [read post]
