Search for: "King v. American Power" Results 641 - 660 of 874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The power of this privilege waned over time, but we still have a perk—courts are reluctant to force defendants to give up their personal names, using disclaimers instead of bans. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
White, Partner at King & Spalding in Atlanta. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am by New Books Script
KF 4749 K557 2012 Judging social rights / Jeff King, University College London. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:34 am by Mariah
Check it out in the Good Reads section.The Supreme Court itself has weighed in on golf, in the 2001 case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm by Steve Vladeck
As the court concluded, Brehm did not target his conduct toward American soil or American commerce. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
 Revised American Version (1901) [American Standard Version]4. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm by royblack
The new American spectacle reminiscent of the Roman coliseum. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
People are discussing the Arizona immigration ruling and, once again, Citizens United and its effect on our democracy.Today, without oral argument or briefing, the Supreme Court handed down American Tradition Partnership v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm by Linda D. Jellum
The Court began its transformation in 1991 in King v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
RumsfeldDocket: 11-1277Issue(s): Whether federal officials responsible for the torture of an American citizen on American soil may be sued for damages under the Constitution.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (4th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionReply of petitioners White v. [read post]