Search for: "Little v. Stevens"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2013, 7:04 am
Though the vote was five to four, this erroneous credit-rating defamation case has often been seen as little more that a minor refinement of the Court’s holding in Gertz v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:35 am
Brown v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm
Nearly three decades later, Justices Scalia and O'Connor picked up the judicial takings theme in a dissent from the denial of certiorari in Stevens v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:28 pm
In New York v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
Yesterday the court heard oral argument in Lynch v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:09 pm
Garcia-Aguilar v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:25 am
For the opinion in the patent case Bilski v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am
Stevens, in light of a bill currently pending in Congress. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The court's unpublished decision in Ng v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:47 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
Stevens. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
In Tandon v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:09 pm
Carrier, I’d like to run a comment by C-PAN regarding the McCormick case and why Kreiner v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie calls Monday’s oral argument in Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The case was Cullen v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
It has been a little over two years since the Supreme Court issued its decision in Bauman v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
(David Post) [** from Wallace Stevens, NY Law School Class of '03, The Man With the Blue Guitar -- though the original reads "for a moment final", a nice example of how much meaning can change when substituting the definite for the indefinite article] The folks over at Justia’s Verdict asked me to give them a piece summarizing the whole SOPA debate and for some reflections of a “now that the dust has settled a bit, what was that all about? [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 10:44 am
During his first argument in Stokeling v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
As articulated in a memorable scene early in Steven Spielberg’s Lincoln, however, there is a reason we needed multiple and foundational amendments.Insisting without qualification on the continuity of our constitutional experience arguably puts Baude and Sachs in poor company. [read post]
