Search for: "Long Term Capital Holdings v. United States"
Results 641 - 654
of 654
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
The state is long overdue in rewarding their commitment, dedication and sacrifice. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599
A7936
Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598
A7905
Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597
A7892
Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in… [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
Let us start today with an August 3, 2007 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia -- the court that Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and John Roberts sat on before they were anointed to the Supreme Court as a reward for their reactionaryism -- in a case called Abigail Alliance For Better Access To Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach . [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
However, many protective provisions say that they are effective as long as “any” shares are outstanding. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
Capital Bank v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
Justice Alito writes for the majority plurality in Hein v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
AI Index: AMR 51/087/2007 When a capital defendant seeks to circumvent procedures necessary to ensure the propriety of his conviction and sentence, he does not ask the State to permit him to take his own life. [read post]
8 May 2007, 9:02 am
If granted, this capital case could be OT2007's Limtiaco v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
Click to read the full court opinion State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 6:53 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 2:00 am
Tax Law in the Aftermath of Long Term Capital Holdings v. [read post]
18 Sep 2006, 8:40 am
***Viral V. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:41 am
So, for example, the Court held that federal taxes on corporate capital (Pacific Insurance v. [read post]
