Search for: "Loving v. United States" Results 641 - 660 of 3,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court did not invalidate a state anti-miscegenation law until 1967 in the famous case of Loving v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm by John Floyd
And what does this policy mean for asylum seekers who want to enter the United States? [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 2:07 pm by Donald Dennison
Despite the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States on June 26, 2015, the effects of longstanding discrimination against the gay and lesbian community continue to linger at both the state and federal level. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 5:08 pm
Class #7 The Freedom of (Illiberal) Association United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:27 pm
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2009, there were about 2.3 million adult drivers and passengers who were treated in emergency rooms across the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
By all accounts, oral argument before the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:27 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Every year, a number of people in Florida and throughout the United States are injured and killed in side impact collisions. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 11:31 am
 He's now 40 years old, and has a lengthy criminal history in the United States, beginning when he was a juvenile. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm by Laura Orr
The following blog post got me to thinking that a legal citation lesson for non-attorneys might be a challenge worth attempting, though I surely won’t get it right the first time.3 Geeks and a Law Blog: Bloomberg Law Gets Cited By A New Jersey Court… A First for “___ BL ___” (citing to United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
Most of the time, those decisions are made by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.On Monday, the parties' lawyers delivered their opening arguments. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am by Juan C. Antúnez
 As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]