Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 641 - 660
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
The House of Lords held that the words were not capable of referring to him. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In England, discussion has been dominated by the House of Commons report [1] and Lord Lester’s law reform bill [2]. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am
Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down judgments in the cases of Hunt v Evening Standard ([2011] EWHC 272 (QB)) and Henry v News Group ([2011] EWHC 296 (QB)) and Mr Justice Eady gave judgment in Lord Ashcroft v Foley ([2011] EWHC 292 (QB)). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:03 am
und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Germany (Case C? [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
Lord Justice Toulson in R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467 famously bemoaned the complexity of legislation: To a worryingly large extent, statutory law is not practically accessible today, even to the courts whose constitutional duty it is to interpret and enforce it. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Broadcaster etc. says: I’m paying all I possibly can now. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Preface… Before I jump into this decision by a U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:30 pm
That’s what I’m paid to do. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
I’m Rick Bickhram. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:04 am
" Oh, good lord. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:11 am
[t]heir Lord is the government, not God. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Baroness Hale (with whom Lords Hope and Walker agreed) gave the leading judgment; Lord Rodger gave a concurring judgment, out of deference to the CA; and Lord Brown doubted the result but, in the oddest final paragraph, basically said that he didn’t care enough to dissent (“At the end of the day, however, I do not feel sufficiently strongly as to the proper outcome of the appeal to carry these doubts to the point of dissent. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Lord Neuberger gave the leading judgement, with LJs LLoyd and Gross concurring. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Lord Neuberger gave the leading judgement, with LJs LLoyd and Gross concurring. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:58 am
If I’m right, it will have a dramatic effect on what they are paying out. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
At first instance, Mr Justice Collins dismissed TTM’s claim holding that his detention had not been unlawful until such time as the court declared the decision-making process to have been defective – applying R v Managers of South Western Hospital ex p M [1993] QB 683 and R v Central London County Court ex p London [1999] QB 1260 and distinguishing Re S-C (Mental Patient Habeas Corpus) [1996] QB 599 as it was not directly concerned with that question. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
Mr M died and M took the whole by survivorship. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
Mr M died and M took the whole by survivorship. [read post]
