Search for: "MARKS v. STATE"
Results 641 - 660
of 21,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2019, 9:10 pm
However, as we have previously reported, recent Australian cases (such as Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92 (Lodestar)) demonstrated that licensing arrangements may expose trade mark owners to the risk of trade mark removal. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:10 pm
However, as we have previously reported, recent Australian cases (such as Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92 (Lodestar)) demonstrated that licensing arrangements may expose trade mark owners to the risk of trade mark removal. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:10 pm
However, as we have previously reported, recent Australian cases (such as Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC [2016] FCAFC 92 (Lodestar)) demonstrated that licensing arrangements may expose trade mark owners to the risk of trade mark removal. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
In Iancu v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
In Iancu v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
The Obama administration’s forbearance on asserting the state secrets privilege in Salim v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:26 am
Scrutinizer GmbH, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, No. 18-1195, 13 September 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:47 am
Mark Movsesian and I have this Legal Spirits podcast discussing Carson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:47 am
The BoA noted that the Opposition Division did not state this to be the case here, nor had Pinball filed any arguments in this respect. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
The post Michigan v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 9:33 am
PSK, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:27 am
People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:16 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:04 am
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
This was because the curved shape towards the inside of the sign from both ends of the black element differ from the ordinary representation of the letter ‘v’ and thus made it closer to the representation of a heart.Novartis v EUIPO concerned situations in which the trade mark applied for was either a three-dimensional mark consisting of the appearance of the designated goods, or a figurative mark consisting of a two-dimensional representation… [read post]
