Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 641 - 660 of 5,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2007, 10:52 pm
The opinion - (a) repudiates Deuel, keyed to language taken from the Supreme Court KSR decision as well as the Federal Circuit Kahn opinion that preceded KSR; and (b) adopts the controversial Enzo line of "written description" biotechnology case law as the position of the PTO Board (p. 15). [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:32 am by Wells Bennett
” Section B (pp. 59-63) is completely redacted, including the section title. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:46 am by Richard Montes
P. 12(b)(1); (b) failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Fed. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by WSLL
Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP OF THOMAS LANKFORD: MAUREEN UTLEY and NORMA BALLWEG v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:31 pm
  As B Sen notes in “The Supreme Court Bench and Bar” in Supreme But Not Infallible: “In the early fifties, the Supreme Court sat as a full court in all constitutional cases and in not more than two divisions where other matters were concerned. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:21 am by <ADMINNICENAME>
(h)(1) A court may order counseling to address underlying matters surrounding the visitation issue under this section if: (A) Counseling is available; (B) Both parties agree to participate in counseling; and (C) One (1) or both of the parties agree to pay for counseling. (2) Records, notes, reports, or discussions related to the counseling shall not be used by the court to determine visitation under this section. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:17 pm by jacquig
Well I am back from the abyss of work I have been plunged into post Baby P although despite statements to the effect that things are slowing down it is marginal.An interesting question has been exercising me: can a holder of a shared residence order take a child on holiday abroad without the consent of the other holder / parent.Regrettably the law is not clear on this and even Hershman & McFarlane (a leading and authoratitive text on UK family law) agrees that this is so. [read post]