Search for: "MATTER OF C M R"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2018, 4:23 pm
For your taxes from A to Z, here’s the rest of the series: A is for Annual Contribution Limits B is for Bonus C is for Choate D is for Direct Deposit E is for Enrolled Agent F is for Found Property G is for Ghost Preparer H is for Hobby Loss Rules I is for Installment Agreement J is for Joint Accounts K is for Kin (Crypto) L is for Line of Credit M is for Mileage N is for NIIT O is for Organ Donations P is for Private and Parochial Schools Q is for Qualifying Relative… [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:03 am
It doesn’t matter which order these elements are available, but you need at least three to succeed. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
G.D. 08-014817 (2008) and by Judge R. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
New is important b/c it’s a democratic endorsement. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
In this case S and M were both tenants of Southwark. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
In this case S and M were both tenants of Southwark. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
It does not require, for instance, depriving someone of “equal privileges and immunities under the laws” (a provision (c) claim). [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
”In contrast section 8 of the Representation Agreement Act provides:Test of incapability for standard provisions8 (1) An adult may make a representation agreement consisting of one or more of the standard provisions authorized by section 7 even though the adult is incapable of(a) making a contract,(b) managing his or her health care, personal care or legal matters, or(c) the routine management of his or her financial affairs.(2) In deciding whether an adult is… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:28 am
§ 1705(c); 31 C.F.R. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:28 am
§ 1705(c); 31 C.F.R. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:28 am
§ 1705(c); 31 C.F.R. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am
M. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 11:16 am
President Richard C. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:02 am
Words matter and when it comes to tax, words matter a great deal. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:53 am
[C]laims of secondary liability for aiding and abetting . . . at least normally requires showings not just of the primary violation, but of additional matters applicable to the aider-and-abettor, such as substantial assistance, and a purpose or intent to advance the primary violation. 2011 WL 284933 at *5-*8 (citations omitted). [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:04 pm
Thanks for reading, Nadia M. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
I'm told some medical schools even advise students to do this post-graduation. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm
Gaitis, C. von Kann, R. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 9:47 am
R. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
“I’m asking you for a theory, why is UC Physicians, the employer of all the doctors in anesthesiology there, why are they not liable? [read post]
