Search for: "Mann v. Mann" Results 641 - 660 of 1,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
In that case Mr Justice Mann went further and said that the Norwich Pharmacal principles should be applied flexibly to adapt to new and changing circumstances. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
In that case Mr Justice Mann went further and said that the Norwich Pharmacal principles should be applied flexibly to adapt to new and changing circumstances. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:01 am by Amy Howe
”Briefly: At Angry Bear, Beverly Mann predicts that the Court’s decision in Bond v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Ronald Mann has our coverage of Wednesday’s second oral argument, in the bankruptcy fees case Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:32 am by John McFarland
This week, the Texas Supreme Court denied Denbury Green Pipeline's motion for rehearing in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’”Mann, 604 F.3d at 1359(quotingMentor H/S, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The speculative nature of plaintiff’s claim of damages arising from defendant Dan Brecher’s alleged conflict of interest in assuming a board position in a company in which plaintiff invested while simultaneously serving as plaintiff’s counsel cannot support a legal malpractice claim (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 294 [1st Dept 2001]). [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 7:50 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
“Moreover, the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations showing that, had he not settled, he would have obtained a more favorable outcome” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; see Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C.,21 AD3d at 1083; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293; Rau v Borenkoff,262 AD2d at… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Nabiha Syed
On this blog, Ronald Mann previews Mims v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
  Mylan et al argued that the IPR could continue because Allergan was the "true owner of the challenged patents".Substance matters more than form and if the substance of the transaction has a party retaining all substantial rights under the patent, then they are a "patent owner" irrespective of whether the transaction characterizes them as such (see Waterman v Mackenzie (1891); Speedplay v Behop (2000); Alfred E Mann Foundation v… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:13 pm by Zoe Tillman
Regan and an attorney for King’s estate, Lawrence Mann of Bethesda, Md. [read post]