Search for: "Mark Gordon"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2020, 5:07 am
As for the first point, EUIPO argued that the aesthetic value of a trade mark is, as a matter of principle, irrelevant. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
Art. 8(5) EUTMR, whereby the owner of a mark with a reputation can prevent the registration of a mark the use of which would take unfair advantage of the reputation, states that such use must be “without due cause”. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:32 am
The court found the mark “POWER FLEX” to be infringing the plaintiff’s house mark “POWER” which has been in use for almost 50 years. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:24 am
The case regards Hasbro, Inc’s EUTM registration of the word mark MONOPOLY for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 28 and 41. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:30 am
There is no requirement to maintain absolute identity of mark, but dominant features of mark must be preserved. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 1:14 am
Esteban’s mark had been filed in bad faith. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:05 pm
As a result of that process, Finlay has selected a bid from Gordon Brothers as the stalking horse, pursuant to which Gordon Brothers would serve as the agent for the liquidation of substantially all of Finlay's remaining assets. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:00 am
Gordon Hylton ('77), Professor of Law, Marquette University Law SchoolPanel 2: Legal Implications of Financial Distress in Professional Sports As professional sports teams encounter financial hardship, conflicts in control arise. [read post]
15 May 2019, 3:50 am
Failure to submit the declaration will lead to the rebuttable presumption that the mark has not been used, but this will not result in the automatic loss of trademark rights. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:18 am
Mr Whippy has a number of registered Australian trade marks: MR. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:37 am
The decision is welcome in that, once again, the Fourth Board was rather quick in denying any similarity between the marks, thereby avoiding any analysis of all the other points raised, in particular, the distinctiveness of the earlier mark. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
Sony’s mark was challenged on the ground of non-use. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 10:10 am
The cancellation applicant was initially successful and had the marks cancelled by the Federal Patent Court, because the Federal Patent Court assumed that the marks only consisted of a shape which resulted from the nature of the goods themselves (Section 3 Para. 2 No. 1 German Trademark Act). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Suggestion: forced position marks? [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
: THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/book-editor-doyle-estate-is-421918 Mark Litwak: http://marklitwak.blogspot.com/2013/03/sherlock-holmes-and-case-of-public.html Create Protect: http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/sherlock-holmes-elementary-copyright-protection-and-trademarks/ Klinger v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:28 pm
– 9th Circuit Court of Appeals petition for rehearing – April 4, 2013 Designer Denied Say in Louboutin Mark Change: Courthouse News: http://www.entlawdigest.com/2013/03/13/2220.htm Original case was Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:01 am
Perhaps Gordon Turner or Damian McCarthy could respond on that? [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:57 am
” Bear in mind the brief quote from Judge Gordon: “The criminal system is a system of criminals. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:50 pm
Norway: Ridicule as a response to claims of trade mark infringement A trade mark infringement matter which has been making the headlines in Norway the last week concerns the small Norwegian beverage producer O. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Brown tried to use Gordon v. [read post]
